CSGO 9600K.OC
Dust 2 1080p Max
239 EFps Slightly Better CSGO EFps.
+10%
217 EFps
GTAV 9600K.OC
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
83 EFps 97 EFps Better GTAV EFps.
+17%
Overwatch 9600K.OC
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
102 EFps 119 EFps Better Overwatch EFps.
+17%
PUBG 9600K.OC
M249 Training 1080p Max
101 EFps 113 EFps Slightly Better PUBG EFps.
+12%
Fortnite 9600K.OC
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
115 EFps 139 EFps Better Fortnite EFps.
+21%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 150,421 user samples
108,309 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 91% Zotac(19DA 4520)
Worst Bench: 78% EVGA(3842 2167)
Poor: 78% Great: 91%
SPEED RANK: 30th / 627
42,112 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 112% AMD(1002 0B36)
Worst Bench: 99% Gigabyte(1458 2313)
Poor: 99% Great: 112%
SPEED RANK: 15th / 627
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
85.7 % 105 % Faster effective speed.
+23%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
340 fps 403 fps Better lighting effects.
+19%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
283 fps Faster multi rendering.
+19%
237 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
295 fps 397 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+35%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
371 fps 441 fps Better peak lighting effects.
+19%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
295 fps Faster peak multi rendering.
+20%
246 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
315 fps 424 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+35%
Market Share
Based on 22,315,070 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.83 % 2.01 % Slightly higher market share.
+10%
Value
Value For Money
62.7 % 64 % +2%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
147 % More popular.
+25%
118 %
Price
Price (score)
$324 Cheaper.
+17%
$390
Age
Newest
10 Months 5 Months Much more recent.
+50%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
309 fps 309 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
386 fps 866 fps Hugely better peak texture detail.
+124%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
200 fps 373 fps Hugely faster peak complex splatting.
+86%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
289 fps 296 fps +2%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
345 fps 779 fps Hugely better texture detail.
+126%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
187 fps 358 fps Hugely faster complex splatting.
+91%
ADVERTISEMENT

The 6GB RTX 2060 is the latest addition to Nvidia’s RTX series of graphics card which are based on their Turing architecture. Turing features AI enhanced graphics and real time ray tracing which is intended to eventually deliver a more realistic gaming experience. The 2060 has 1920 CUDA cores and 336GB/s of GDRR6 memory bandwidth. With a launch price of $350 for the Founders Edition, the 2060 offered the best value for money amongst the RTX range and somewhat redeemed Nvidia from their earlier RTX releases (2070, 2080, 2080 Ti) which were unrealistically priced. The 2060 is capable of delivering 100+ EFps in almost all of today’s popular games at 1080p with maximum details. This should more than satisfy the majority of 1080p gamers including those who play at 144Hz. Rapidly diminishing returns lie beyond the 2060’s price point of $325 and they are not worth it for the majority of gamers that play on or below 1080p. For gamers that play on 1440p the next step up would be to the $400 2060S[Nov '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Out of the box the reference 5700 XT has high burst speeds but under load it overheats and therefore drops frames to the extent that it is more or less unusable for demanding games like PUBG. In order to settle the card it was under volted by 120 mV and the maximum clock was lowered to 1,980 MHz (the stock BIOS and 19.9.1 driver defaulted the card to 2,030 MHz). The fan curve also had to be turned up to around 50% power at 75 degrees (which is a lot noisier than stock). After making these changes the card delivered far more consistent performance albeit with a reduced top speed and unacceptable (hair dryer) levels of noise. There were also incompatibilities with GTAV: enabling reflection MSAA resulted in very poor, almost matt, reflection fidelity (the same bug appeared on several Navi and Vega cards). The reference 5700 XT is great for beating benchmarks, but it is not so great for playing games. Thousands of people purchased the reference card expecting flagship performance, instead they got a shopping trolley with a V6 engine. It appears that the same marketing tactics were employed for the reference Vega 56 and 64 series of graphics cards which we will purchase for our gaming lab and generate effective Fps gaming metrics as soon as possible (results here). AMD appear to have very short term marketing strategists at the helm, they seem more concerned with this years bonuses than the longevity of the brand. [Jul '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) December 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $244Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $200AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $360Nvidia RTX 2060 $324Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $58SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback