UserBenchmark: Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) vs RTX 2060

GPU
RANKINGS

TEST
YOUR GPU

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Nvidia

BUY • $324

Nvidia

BUY • $300

BenchYourGPU

Watch Gameplay


CSGO Dust 2 1080p Max	245 EFps	+2%	240 EFps
GTAV Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max	96 EFps	Much Better GTAV EFps. +45%	66 EFps
Overwatch Temple of Anubis 1080p Max	119 EFps	Much Better Overwatch EFps. +55%	77 EFps
PUBG M249 Training 1080p Max	117 EFps	Much Better PUBG EFps. +46%	80 EFps
Fortnite UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max	131 EFps	Much Better Fortnite EFps. +41%	93 EFps

Real World Speed

Performance profile from 825,737 user samples

Benchmark your GPU here

645,160 User Benchmarks

Best Bench: 97% Asus(1043 868E)
Worst Bench: 80% MSI(1462 3755)

Poor: 80% Great: 97%

SPEED RANK: 77^th / 714

180,577 User Benchmarks

Best Bench: 62% MSI(1462 8D95)
Worst Bench: 53% Gigabyte(1458 401A)

Poor: 53% Great: 62%

SPEED RANK: 114^th / 714


Effective 3D Speed Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed		89.8 %	Much faster effective speed. +53%		58.7 %


Lighting Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)	113 fps	Much better lighting effects. +48%	76.2 fps
Reflection Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)	118 fps	Much better reflection handling. +48%	79.5 fps
MRender Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)	132 fps	Hugely faster multi rendering. +112%	62.3 fps
Gravity Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)	99.1 fps	Much faster NBody calculation. +38%	71.9 fps


Lighting Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)	124 fps	Much better peak lighting effects. +52%	81.5 fps
Reflection High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)	164 fps	Much better peak reflection handling. +53%	107 fps
MRender Render target array GShader (Sphere)	140 fps	Hugely faster peak multi rendering. +111%	66.4 fps
Gravity NBody particle system (Galaxy)	107 fps	Much faster peak NBody calculation. +40%	76.3 fps

Market Share

Based on 67,422,182 GPUs tested

See market share leaders


Market Share Market Share (trailing 30 days)	2.02 %	Hugely higher market share. +281%	0.53 %
Value Value For Money	65.6 %	Much better value. +42%	46.3 %
User Rating UBM User Rating	87 %	+1%	86 %
Price Price (score)	$324		$300	Slightly cheaper. +7%


Age Newest	63 Months		53 Months	More recent. +16%
Parallax Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)	123 fps	Much better peak texture detail. +53%	80.5 fps
Splatting Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)	97.5 fps	Much faster peak complex splatting. +55%	62.8 fps
Parallax Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)	109 fps	Much better texture detail. +50%	72.9 fps
Splatting Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)	90.6 fps	Much faster complex splatting. +56%	58.1 fps

The 6GB RTX 2060 is the latest addition to Nvidia’s RTX series of graphics card which are based on their Turing architecture. Turing features AI enhanced graphics and real time ray tracing which is intended to eventually deliver a more realistic gaming experience. The 2060 has 1920 CUDA cores and 336GB/s of GDRR6 memory bandwidth. With a launch price of $350 for the Founders Edition, the 2060 offered the best value for money amongst the RTX range and somewhat redeemed Nvidia from their earlier RTX releases (2070, 2080, 2080 Ti) which were unrealistically priced. The RTX 2060 also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. The 2060 is capable of delivering 100+ EFps in almost all of today’s popular games at 1080p with maximum details. This should more than satisfy the majority of 1080p gamers including those who play at 144Hz. Rapidly diminishing returns lie beyond the 2060’s price point of $325 and they are not worth it for the majority of gamers that play at or below 1080p. For gamers that play at 1440p the next step up would be to the $400 2060S. ^{[Nov '19 GPUPro]}

MORE DETAILS

The Nvidia GTX 1650 Super features 12Gbps GDDR6 up from 8Gbps of GDDR5 on the “not super” GTX 1650. With a launch price of just $160 the 1650S is aimed squarely at AMD’s 500 series cards. Comparing the GTX 1650S and the RX 590 shows that the 590 leads by 3% but the 1650S is around 10% cheaper. The 1650S has a TDP of 100W which is 50% lower than a typical AMD 500 series card. With a lower TDP, the 1650S requires a less demanding thermal solution and therefore runs a lot quieter. Nvidia’s top value offering prior to the 1650S was the $70 more expensive 1660S which is around 18% faster but also 40% more expensive than the 1650S. Although the 1650S promises to shake up, if not dominate, the value end of the GPU market, street prices are ultimately king. Further price cuts could, once again, bring AMD’s 500 series back into the game. ^{[Nov '19 GPUPro]}

MORE DETAILS

Systems with these GPUs

Top Builds that include these GPUs

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. ^[GPUPro]

Group Test Results

Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming

Desktop

ProGaming

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

USB

How it works

- Download and run UserBenchmark
- CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
- GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
- Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
- RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
- SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
- Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
- Identify the strongest components in your PC
- See speed test results from other users
- Compare your components to the current market leaders
- Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
- Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

Frequently Asked Questions

Computer Components FAQ

What is the UBM value for money rating?

What is UBM Effective Speed?

Thunderbolt speed?

Are USB 3.0 cables different?

Graphics Cards

How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs?

What are the UBM DX11 GPU tests?

What are the UBM DX10 GPU tests?

What are the UBM DX09 GPU tests?

What is the Splatting GPU benchmark?

What is the Gravity (NBody) GPU benchmark?

What is the MRender GPU benchmark?

What is the parallax (POM) GPU benchmark?

What is the reflection (HDR) GPU benchmark?

What is the lighting (LDPRT) benchmark?

What is the GPU value for money rating?

What is the effective GPU speed index?

ALL FAQs »

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

MORE DETAILS

MORE DETAILS

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

Group Test Results

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

Frequently Asked Questions

Best User Rated

Feedback