CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max
280 EFps Better CSGO EFps.
+19%
236 EFps
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
110 EFps Much Better GTAV EFps.
+41%
78 EFps
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
138 EFps Much Better Overwatch EFps.
+41%
98 EFps
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max
135 EFps Much Better PUBG EFps.
+44%
94 EFps
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
133 EFps Better Fortnite EFps.
+14%
117 EFps
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 241,067 user samples
176,362 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 109% Gigabyte(1458 3FF8)
Worst Bench: 93% Gigabyte(1458 4009) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 93% Great: 109%
SPEED RANK: 27th / 651
64,705 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 93% Sapphire(1DA2 E376)
Worst Bench: 71% MSI(1462 3681)
Poor: 71% Great: 93%
SPEED RANK: 45th / 651
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
102 % Faster effective speed.
+26%
80.7 %
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
124 fps Better lighting effects.
+22%
102 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
117 fps Better reflection handling.
+11%
105 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
177 fps Hugely faster multi rendering.
+99%
88.9 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
115 fps +5% 110 fps
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
133 fps Better peak lighting effects.
+12%
119 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
167 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+48%
113 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
188 fps Hugely faster peak multi rendering.
+98%
95.1 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
121 fps 127 fps +5%
Market Share
Based on 36,084,897 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.6 % Hugely higher market share.
+540%
0.25 %
Value
Value For Money
50.1 % Better value.
+14%
43.9 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
169 % Much more popular.
+46%
116 %
Price
Price (score)
$480 $436 Slightly cheaper.
+9%
Age
Newest
16 Months Much more recent.
+59%
39 Months
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
142 fps 185 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+30%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
111 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+41%
78.6 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
127 fps 159 fps Better texture detail.
+25%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
102 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+36%
75.1 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Nvidia’s RTX 2060 Super GPU is a refreshed version of their RTX 2060 launched just 10 months prior. With this iteration, NVIDIA are hoping to contest AMD’s recent RX 5700 and RX 5700 XT with a better value proposition than compared to the 2060. The RTX 2060 Super uses the same GPU die as in the 2060, but has extra CUDA cores (increasing from 1920 to 2176) and 8 GB of GDDR6 memory (up from 6 GB), capable of delivering 448 GB/s of memory bandwidth. It has a has a TDP of 175 W, compared to 160 W in the 2060. The RTX 2060S also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. The 15-20% increase in effective speed from the 2060 to 2060 Super costs around $50 on reference price tags. For now Nvidia will retain the "not-Super" RTX 2060 as the most affordable GPU in the ray-tracing 2000 series at $350 USD. [Jul '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Radeon RX Vega 56 is the weakest member of AMD's Vega GPU family. The Vega architecture is built on 14 nm silicon and contains next-generation compute units (nCUs). Each NCU houses 64 steam processors, of which the Vega 56 has 3584 vs. 4096 in the Vega 64. The new architecture employs 8GB of second generation high-bandwidth memory (HBM2). In terms of compatibility all of the games we tested were fine apart from GTAV where enabling reflection MSAA resulted in very poor, almost matt, reflection fidelity (the same bug appeared on several Navi and Vega cards). Although the Vega 56 has 12.5% less processing units, users have found that by flashing an RX 64 BIOS into an RX 56 card allows a 10% increase in OC headroom which effectively brings a BIOS flashed RX 56 onto par with a stock RX 64 and just 12.5% slower than a fully overclocked RX 64. All of this OC headroom is great on paper but in the real world the reference Vega 56 is far too noisy. Hair dryer levels of noise at stock clocks are unacceptable for most users. Provided you are partially deaf or happy to use noise canceling headphones the Vega 56 “can” deliver levels of performance that approach an RTX 2060 but prices need to drop below $200 before the Vega 56 is competitive. [Nov '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) December 2020 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $197Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $34
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $268Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $190Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $177
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $64SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $639SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback