Real World Speed
Performance profile from 112,705 user samples
65,609 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 120% EVGA(3842 3071)
Worst Bench: 98% Gigabyte(1458 4001)
Poor: 98% Great: 120%
SPEED RANK: 14th / 634
47,096 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 50% MSI(1462 3411)
Worst Bench: 38% XFX(1682 9470)
Poor: 38% Great: 50%
SPEED RANK: 78th / 634
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
112 % Hugely faster effective speed.
+150%
44.8 %
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
445 fps Hugely better lighting effects.
+191%
153 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
376 fps Hugely faster multi rendering.
+187%
131 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
383 fps Hugely faster NBody calculation.
+139%
160 fps
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
487 fps Hugely better peak lighting effects.
+155%
191 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
406 fps Hugely faster peak multi rendering.
+192%
139 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
411 fps Hugely faster peak NBody calculation.
+125%
183 fps
CSGO
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
232 Fps Much Better CSGO Fps.
+66%
140 Fps
Fortnite
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
167 Fps Hugely Better Fortnite Fps.
+99%
84 Fps
PUBG
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
117 Fps Hugely Better PUBG Fps.
+120%
53 Fps
GTAV
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
112 Fps Hugely Better GTAV Fps.
+130%
49 Fps
LoL
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
234 Fps Much Better LoL Fps.
+78%
132 Fps
Overwatch
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
127 Fps Much Better Overwatch Fps.
+45%
88 Fps
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
122 Fps Hugely Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Fps.
+156%
48 Fps
Minecraft
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
254 Fps Hugely Better Minecraft Fps.
+133%
109 Fps
WoW
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
130 Fps Hugely Better WoW Fps.
+162%
50 Fps
Market Share
Based on 23,706,542 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
2.69 % Hugely higher market share.
+715%
0.33 %
Value
Value For Money
53 % 84.5 % Much better value.
+59%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
122 % Much more popular.
+36%
90 %
Price
Price (score)
$500 $126 Much cheaper.
+75%
Age
Newest
6 Months Hugely more recent.
+85%
41 Months
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
399 fps Hugely better peak reflection handling.
+132%
172 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
519 fps Hugely better peak texture detail.
+96%
265 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
256 fps Hugely faster peak complex splatting.
+103%
126 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
370 fps Hugely better reflection handling.
+128%
162 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
464 fps Hugely better texture detail.
+105%
226 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
241 fps Hugely faster complex splatting.
+101%
120 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

The RTX 2070 Super replaces the RTX 2070 in Nvidia’s line-up of ray-tracing high performance GPUs, yielding around a 10% performance improvement at the same $500 USD price point. The 2070 Super has been upgraded to use the same GPU die as in the RTX 2080, and now has 2560 CUDA cores, up from 2304 in the 2070. It has a base and boost clock speed of 1605 and 1770 MHz respectively and a 215 W power draw compared to the 185 W per the original 2070. The RTX 2070S also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. The launch of the RTX 2070 Super comes at an exciting time for those in the market for a new graphics card, who can also choose from AMD’s latest first generation RDNA RX 5700 and RX 5700 XT. Some swift maneuvering on price by AMD prior to launch date means that the RX 5700 XT is currently $100 USD cheaper than the 2070 Super. An RTX 2060 Super has also been launched. Also, an RTX 2080 Super is set for launch in the near future which will replace the 2080 offering at the $700 price point. [Jul '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The RX 470 is the second Polaris based 14 nm graphics card released by AMD this year. The 470 follows hot on the heels of the hugely successful (though still mostly unavailable) RX 480. Based on specs the RX 470 has approximately 10% less processing horsepower than the RX 480. Looking at provisional average benchmarks (we only three samples of the RX 470 at this time) of the RX 480 and RX 470 shows that the performance gap is just a few percent. This performance gap will likely widen as we get a more representative number of samples of the RX 470 but the fact that custom design 470s are already available will likely keep the gap between the 480 less than 10%, at least until custom 480s make it to market. The list prices of both the 4GB RX 480 and RX 470 cards are within 20 USD of each other so AMD have basically re-released the 480 at a slightly reduced price with slightly reduced specs, strange but true! [Aug '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) January 2020 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $218Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $42
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $356Nvidia RTX 2060 $349Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $653SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback