CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max
285 EFps Better CSGO EFps.
+19%
240 EFps
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
122 EFps Much Better GTAV EFps.
+42%
86 EFps
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
154 EFps Much Better Overwatch EFps.
+56%
99 EFps
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max
145 EFps Much Better PUBG EFps.
+56%
93 EFps
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
171 EFps Much Better Fortnite EFps.
+42%
120 EFps
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 982,165 user samples
663,603 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 123% Asus(1043 8727) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 105% Dell(1028 C723) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 105% Great: 123%
SPEED RANK: 49th / 714
318,562 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 81% MSI(1462 3750)
Worst Bench: 70% Gigabyte(1458 3FBE)
Poor: 70% Great: 81%
SPEED RANK: 95th / 714
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
115 % Much faster effective speed.
+52%
76 %
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
150 fps Much better lighting effects.
+55%
96.9 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
154 fps Much better reflection handling.
+56%
98.8 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
182 fps Hugely faster multi rendering.
+88%
96.9 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
129 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+44%
89.4 fps
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
164 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+58%
104 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
208 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+55%
134 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
196 fps Hugely faster peak multi rendering.
+90%
103 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
137 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+46%
93.8 fps
Market Share
Based on 67,421,897 GPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.42 % Hugely higher market share.
+87%
0.76 %
Value
Value For Money
130 % +3% 126 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
85 % +4% 82 %
Price
Price (score)
$210 $143 Much cheaper.
+32%
Age
Newest
57 Months Slightly more recent.
+7%
61 Months
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
169 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+76%
95.9 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
122 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+52%
80.1 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
148 fps Much better texture detail.
+69%
87.6 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
115 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+52%
75.7 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

The RTX 2070 Super replaces the RTX 2070 in Nvidia’s line-up of ray-tracing high performance GPUs, yielding around a 10% performance improvement at the same $500 USD price point. The 2070 Super has been upgraded to use the same GPU die as in the RTX 2080, and now has 2560 CUDA cores, up from 2304 in the 2070. It has a base and boost clock speed of 1605 and 1770 MHz respectively and a 215 W power draw compared to the 185 W per the original 2070. The RTX 2070S also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. The launch of the RTX 2070 Super comes at an exciting time for those in the market for a new graphics card, who can also choose from AMD’s latest first generation RDNA RX 5700 and RX 5700 XT. Some swift maneuvering on price by AMD prior to launch date means that the RX 5700 XT is currently $100 USD cheaper than the 2070 Super. An RTX 2060 Super has also been launched. Also, an RTX 2080 Super is set for launch in the near future which will replace the 2080 offering at the $700 price point. [Jul '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The GTX 1660 Ti the latest mid-range and mid-priced graphics card for gamers, succeeding the now two year old GTX 1060 6GB. As NVIDIA have tried to imply with their naming convention, performance of this 16 series GPU lies somewhere between their 10 series and 20 series but the 16 does not contain any of the recent RTX cores, which given the lack of RTX ready games, by itself is no hindrance at all. The 1660 Ti features a new TU116 Turing based die, 6GB of VRAM, 1536 CUDA cores and has a 120W TDP which is a remarkably low power draw for its performance. The reference GPU clock speeds are 1500MHz and 1770MHz for base and boost respectively, and manufacturer overclocked speeds will be higher. The 1660 Ti also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. Early benchmarks show that the 1660 Ti has a clear 33% effective speed advantage over its $60 cheaper 1060 6GB predecessor and that it performs just 4% slower than the $80 more expensive GTX 1070 in terms of effective speed. As well as crowding out the direct competition from NVIDIA’s own 1070, at an opening price of $280, the GTX 1660 Ti competes squarely with AMD’s RX 590 ($260) which has an 18% lower effective speed. Perhaps this will be an impetus for AMD to adjust pricing for the RX 590 and offer something more value-led in the mid-range. [Feb '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback