Real World Speed
Performance profile from 148,420 user samples
13,727 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 122% Asus(1043 8708) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 101% EVGA(3842 3071) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 101% Great: 122%
SPEED RANK: 14th / 621
134,693 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 112% Zotac(19DA 1511) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 91% Asus(1043 8670)
Poor: 91% Great: 112%
SPEED RANK: 18th / 621
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
113 % Slightly faster effective speed.
+10%
102 %
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
470 fps Slightly better texture detail.
+14%
412 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
377 fps +4% 364 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
386 fps +3% 376 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
241 fps Slightly faster complex splatting.
+6%
228 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
522 fps Slightly better peak texture detail.
+12%
468 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
405 fps +3% 395 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
415 fps +1% 410 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
258 fps +4% 249 fps
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
234 fps 237 fps +1%
Fortnite
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
182 fps Better Fortnite fps.
+24%
147 fps
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
125 fps Better PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds fps.
+21%
103 fps
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
118 fps Better Grand Theft Auto V fps.
+20%
99 fps
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
221 fps 241 fps Slightly Better League of Legends fps.
+9%
Minecraft
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
280 fps +2% 276 fps
Market Share
Based on 20,225,621 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.46 % 2.23 % Much higher market share.
+53%
Value
Value For Money
48.6 % 53.9 % Slightly better value.
+11%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
116 % More popular.
+22%
95 %
Price
Price (score)
$550 $450 Cheaper.
+18%
Age
Newest
2 Months Hugely more recent.
+82%
11 Months
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
492 fps Slightly better peak lighting effects.
+14%
433 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
401 fps Better peak reflection handling.
+16%
345 fps
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
452 fps Better lighting effects.
+16%
390 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
373 fps Better reflection handling.
+17%
318 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

The RTX 2070 Super replaces the RTX 2070 in Nvidia’s line-up of ray-tracing high performance GPUs, yielding around a 10% performance improvement at the same $500 USD price point. The 2070 Super has been upgraded to use the same GPU die as in the RTX 2080, and now has 2560 CUDA cores, up from 2304 in the 2070. It has a base and boost clock speed of 1605 and 1770 MHz respectively and a 215 W power draw compared to the 185 W per the original 2070. The launch of the RTX 2070 Super comes at an exciting time for those in the market for a new graphics card, who can also choose from AMD’s latest first generation RDNA RX 5700 and RX 5700 XT. Some swift maneuvering on price by AMD prior to launch date means that the RX 5700 XT is currently $100 USD cheaper than the 2070 Super. An RTX 2060 Super has also been launched. Also, an RTX 2080 Super is set for launch in the near future which will replace the 2080 offering at the $700 price point. [Jul '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

NVDIA’s RTX 2070 follows on from their recent release of the 2080 and 2080 Ti from their RTX 2000 series of Turing architecture GPUs. The 2070 has 2304 CUDA cores, a base/boost clock of 1410/1620 MHz, 8GB of GDRR6 memory and a memory bandwidth of 448GB/s. Traditionally NVIDIA’s 70 range has offered better value for money than the more powerful 80 GPUs. The Founders Edition 2070 has an MSRP of $599 which makes both new 1080 and used 1080 Ti GPUs decent options. The price premium over the previous generation of GPUs is, for the most part, for NVIDIA’s new ray tracing technology, and unfortunately, the benefit of this is currently unknown as there are no RTX ready games. Performance benchmarks on tangibles place the 2070 6% ahead of the 1080 in terms of effective speed and 17% behind the 1080 Ti. Since AMD’s similarly priced RX Vega 64 has a 13% lower effective speed, there is no real pressure on NVIDIA to compete agressively with thier own previous generation of cards.  [Oct '18 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) September 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1660 $220Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $70
Intel Core i5-9600K $225Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $275Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $80
Intel Core i7-9700K $350Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super) $429Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $799SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $64Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback