CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max
285 EFps Slightly Better CSGO EFps.
+9%
262 EFps
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
122 EFps Slightly Better GTAV EFps.
+7%
114 EFps
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
154 EFps Slightly Better Overwatch EFps.
+8%
143 EFps
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max
145 EFps Slightly Better PUBG EFps.
+6%
137 EFps
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
171 EFps Slightly Better Fortnite EFps.
+8%
158 EFps
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 547,160 user samples
271,506 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 122% MSI(1462 C729)
Worst Bench: 85% Gigabyte(1458 4008)
Poor: 85% Great: 122%
SPEED RANK: 17th / 643
275,654 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 119% Asus(1043 8670)
Worst Bench: 91% Gigabyte(1458 4011) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 91% Great: 119%
SPEED RANK: 18th / 643
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
111 % +3% 107 %
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
440 fps Better lighting effects.
+17%
377 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
374 fps +3% 363 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
378 fps +3% 368 fps
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
500 fps Better peak lighting effects.
+14%
437 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
423 fps Slightly faster peak multi rendering.
+6%
400 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
417 fps +2% 410 fps
Market Share
Based on 33,323,679 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
3.28 % Much higher market share.
+78%
1.84 %
Value
Value For Money
51.9 % 56.5 % Slightly better value.
+9%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
175 % Much more popular.
+62%
108 %
Price
Price (score)
$505 $450 Cheaper.
+11%
Age
Newest
14 Months Much more recent.
+39%
23 Months
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
405 fps Better peak reflection handling.
+16%
349 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
526 fps Better peak texture detail.
+11%
476 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
260 fps +4% 251 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
364 fps Better reflection handling.
+17%
312 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
462 fps Better texture detail.
+14%
405 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
237 fps Slightly faster complex splatting.
+7%
222 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

The RTX 2070 Super replaces the RTX 2070 in Nvidia’s line-up of ray-tracing high performance GPUs, yielding around a 10% performance improvement at the same $500 USD price point. The 2070 Super has been upgraded to use the same GPU die as in the RTX 2080, and now has 2560 CUDA cores, up from 2304 in the 2070. It has a base and boost clock speed of 1605 and 1770 MHz respectively and a 215 W power draw compared to the 185 W per the original 2070. The RTX 2070S also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. The launch of the RTX 2070 Super comes at an exciting time for those in the market for a new graphics card, who can also choose from AMD’s latest first generation RDNA RX 5700 and RX 5700 XT. Some swift maneuvering on price by AMD prior to launch date means that the RX 5700 XT is currently $100 USD cheaper than the 2070 Super. An RTX 2060 Super has also been launched. Also, an RTX 2080 Super is set for launch in the near future which will replace the 2080 offering at the $700 price point. [Jul '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

NVDIA’s RTX 2070 follows on from their recent release of the 2080 and 2080 Ti from their RTX 2000 series of Turing architecture GPUs. The 2070 has 2304 CUDA cores, a base/boost clock of 1410/1620 MHz, 8GB of GDRR6 memory and a memory bandwidth of 448GB/s. The RTX 2070 also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. Traditionally NVIDIA’s 70 range has offered better value for money than the more powerful 80 GPUs. The Founders Edition 2070 has an MSRP of $599 which makes both new 1080 and used 1080 Ti GPUs decent options. The price premium over the previous generation of GPUs is, for the most part, for NVIDIA’s new ray tracing technology, and unfortunately, the benefit of this is currently unknown as there are no RTX ready games. Performance benchmarks on tangibles place the 2070 6% ahead of the 1080 in terms of effective speed and 17% behind the 1080 Ti. Since AMD’s similarly priced RX Vega 64 has a 13% lower effective speed, there is no real pressure on NVIDIA to compete agressively with thier own previous generation of cards.  [Oct '18 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) September 2020 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $195Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $290Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $505Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $47
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Extreme 16GB $28
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback