Real World Speed
Performance profile from 956,234 user samples
478,117 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 112% Gigabyte(1458 37B6) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 93% MSI(1462 3732)
Poor: 93% Great: 112%
SPEED RANK: 60th / 714
478,117 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 112% Gigabyte(1458 37B6) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 93% MSI(1462 3732)
Poor: 93% Great: 112%
SPEED RANK: 60th / 714
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
104 % 104 %
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
104 % 104 %
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
128 fps 128 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
119 fps 119 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
174 fps 174 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
125 fps 125 fps
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
143 fps 143 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
170 fps 170 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
187 fps 187 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
136 fps 136 fps
CSGO
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
235 Fps 235 Fps
Fortnite
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
147 Fps 147 Fps
PUBG
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
104 Fps 104 Fps
GTAV
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
101 Fps 101 Fps
LoL
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
237 Fps 237 Fps
Overwatch
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
124 Fps 124 Fps
BF1
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
115 Fps 115 Fps
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
106 Fps 106 Fps
Minecraft
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
281 Fps 281 Fps
DOTA 2
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
176 Fps 176 Fps
WoW
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
102 Fps 102 Fps
WoT
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
164 Fps 164 Fps
Market Share
Based on 67,400,742 GPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.02 % 1.02 %
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.02 % 1.02 %
Value
Value For Money
123 % 123 %
Value
Value For Money
123 % 123 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
67 % 67 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
67 % 67 %
Price
Price (score)
$200 $200
Price
Price (score)
$200 $200
Age
Newest
65 Months 65 Months
Age
Newest
65 Months 65 Months
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
145 fps 145 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
113 fps 113 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
129 fps 129 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
105 fps 105 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

NVDIA’s RTX 2070 follows on from their recent release of the 2080 and 2080 Ti from their RTX 2000 series of Turing architecture GPUs. The 2070 has 2304 CUDA cores, a base/boost clock of 1410/1620 MHz, 8GB of GDRR6 memory and a memory bandwidth of 448GB/s. The RTX 2070 also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. Traditionally NVIDIA’s 70 range has offered better value for money than the more powerful 80 GPUs. The Founders Edition 2070 has an MSRP of $599 which makes both new 1080 and used 1080 Ti GPUs decent options. The price premium over the previous generation of GPUs is, for the most part, for NVIDIA’s new ray tracing technology, and unfortunately, the benefit of this is currently unknown as there are no RTX ready games. Performance benchmarks on tangibles place the 2070 6% ahead of the 1080 in terms of effective speed and 17% behind the 1080 Ti. Since AMD’s similarly priced RX Vega 64 has a 13% lower effective speed, there is no real pressure on NVIDIA to compete agressively with thier own previous generation of cards.  [Oct '18 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

NVDIA’s RTX 2070 follows on from their recent release of the 2080 and 2080 Ti from their RTX 2000 series of Turing architecture GPUs. The 2070 has 2304 CUDA cores, a base/boost clock of 1410/1620 MHz, 8GB of GDRR6 memory and a memory bandwidth of 448GB/s. The RTX 2070 also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. Traditionally NVIDIA’s 70 range has offered better value for money than the more powerful 80 GPUs. The Founders Edition 2070 has an MSRP of $599 which makes both new 1080 and used 1080 Ti GPUs decent options. The price premium over the previous generation of GPUs is, for the most part, for NVIDIA’s new ray tracing technology, and unfortunately, the benefit of this is currently unknown as there are no RTX ready games. Performance benchmarks on tangibles place the 2070 6% ahead of the 1080 in terms of effective speed and 17% behind the 1080 Ti. Since AMD’s similarly priced RX Vega 64 has a 13% lower effective speed, there is no real pressure on NVIDIA to compete agressively with thier own previous generation of cards.  [Oct '18 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback