Real World Speed
Performance profile from 168,878 user samples
84,439 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 144% Gigabyte(1458 37B7) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 61% Gigabyte(1458 37AD)
Poor: 61% Great: 144%
SPEED RANK: 14th / 613
84,439 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 144% Gigabyte(1458 37B7) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 61% Gigabyte(1458 37AD)
Poor: 61% Great: 144%
SPEED RANK: 14th / 613
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
128 % 128 %
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
128 % 128 %
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
393 fps 393 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
351 fps 351 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
363 fps 363 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
222 fps 222 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
472 fps 472 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
391 fps 391 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
409 fps 409 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
248 fps 248 fps
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
196 fps 196 fps
Fortnite
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
150 fps 150 fps
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
109 fps 109 fps
Grand Theft Auto V
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
98 fps 98 fps
League of Legends
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
256 fps 256 fps
Overwatch
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
123 fps 123 fps
Battlefield 1
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
129 fps 129 fps
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
101 fps 101 fps
DOTA 2
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
166 fps 166 fps
World of Warcraft
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
96 fps 96 fps
World of Tanks
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
172 fps 172 fps
Minecraft
Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max
245 fps 245 fps
Market Share
Based on 17,581,686 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
2.54 % 2.54 %
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
2.54 % 2.54 %
Value
Value For Money
107 % 107 %
Value
Value For Money
107 % 107 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
91 % 91 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
91 % 91 %
Price
Price (score)
$480 $480
Price
Price (score)
$480 $480
Age
Newest
7 Months 7 Months
Age
Newest
7 Months 7 Months
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
433 fps 433 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
344 fps 344 fps
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
372 fps 372 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
306 fps 306 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

NVDIA’s RTX 2070 follows on from their recent release of the 2080 and 2080 Ti from their RTX 2000 series of Turing architecture GPUs. The 2070 has 2304 CUDA cores, a base/boost clock of 1410/1620 MHz, 8GB of GDRR6 memory and a memory bandwidth of 448GB/s. Traditionally NVIDIA’s 70 range has offered better value for money than the more powerful 80 GPUs. The Founders Edition 2070 has an MSRP of $599 which makes both new 1080 and used 1080 Ti GPUs decent options. The price premium over the previous generation of GPUs is, for the most part, for NVIDIA’s new ray tracing technology, and unfortunately, the benefit of this is currently unknown as there are no RTX ready games. Performance benchmarks on tangibles place the 2070 6% ahead of the 1080 in terms of effective speed and 17% behind the 1080 Ti. Since AMD’s similarly priced RX Vega 64 has a 13% lower effective speed, there is no real pressure on NVIDIA to compete agressively with thier own previous generation of cards.  [Oct '18 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

NVDIA’s RTX 2070 follows on from their recent release of the 2080 and 2080 Ti from their RTX 2000 series of Turing architecture GPUs. The 2070 has 2304 CUDA cores, a base/boost clock of 1410/1620 MHz, 8GB of GDRR6 memory and a memory bandwidth of 448GB/s. Traditionally NVIDIA’s 70 range has offered better value for money than the more powerful 80 GPUs. The Founders Edition 2070 has an MSRP of $599 which makes both new 1080 and used 1080 Ti GPUs decent options. The price premium over the previous generation of GPUs is, for the most part, for NVIDIA’s new ray tracing technology, and unfortunately, the benefit of this is currently unknown as there are no RTX ready games. Performance benchmarks on tangibles place the 2070 6% ahead of the 1080 in terms of effective speed and 17% behind the 1080 Ti. Since AMD’s similarly priced RX Vega 64 has a 13% lower effective speed, there is no real pressure on NVIDIA to compete agressively with thier own previous generation of cards.  [Oct '18 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $365Nvidia GTX 1070 $335Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $85
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 $139Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $230Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $100
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X $280Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $808Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $97
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $128
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $646SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $85SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback