CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max
285 EFps Better CSGO EFps.
+24%
229 EFps
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
122 EFps Better GTAV EFps.
+11%
110 EFps
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
154 EFps Better Overwatch EFps.
+12%
138 EFps
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max
145 EFps Better PUBG EFps.
+14%
127 EFps
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
171 EFps Slightly Better Fortnite EFps.
+9%
157 EFps
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 1,124,664 user samples
663,603 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 123% Asus(1043 8727) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 105% Dell(1028 C723) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 105% Great: 123%
SPEED RANK: 36th / 692
461,061 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 105% Sapphire(1DA2 E410) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 91% XFX(1682 5701)
Poor: 91% Great: 105%
SPEED RANK: 50th / 692
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
115 % Faster effective speed.
+17%
99 %
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
150 fps Better lighting effects.
+20%
125 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
154 fps Slightly better reflection handling.
+10%
140 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
182 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+54%
118 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
129 fps 142 fps Faster NBody calculation.
+10%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
164 fps Better peak lighting effects.
+21%
136 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
208 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+42%
146 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
196 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+61%
122 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
137 fps 154 fps Faster peak NBody calculation.
+12%
Market Share
Based on 58,517,178 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.35 % Hugely higher market share.
+286%
0.35 %
Value
Value For Money
54.7 % 81.3 % Much better value.
+49%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
85 % Much more popular.
+47%
58 %
Price
Price (score)
$500 $289 Much cheaper.
+42%
Age
Newest
42 Months 42 Months
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
169 fps 219 fps Better peak texture detail.
+30%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
122 fps Faster peak complex splatting.
+24%
98.1 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
148 fps 194 fps Much better texture detail.
+31%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
115 fps Faster complex splatting.
+22%
94.6 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

The RTX 2070 Super replaces the RTX 2070 in Nvidia’s line-up of ray-tracing high performance GPUs, yielding around a 10% performance improvement at the same $500 USD price point. The 2070 Super has been upgraded to use the same GPU die as in the RTX 2080, and now has 2560 CUDA cores, up from 2304 in the 2070. It has a base and boost clock speed of 1605 and 1770 MHz respectively and a 215 W power draw compared to the 185 W per the original 2070. The RTX 2070S also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. The launch of the RTX 2070 Super comes at an exciting time for those in the market for a new graphics card, who can also choose from AMD’s latest first generation RDNA RX 5700 and RX 5700 XT. Some swift maneuvering on price by AMD prior to launch date means that the RX 5700 XT is currently $100 USD cheaper than the 2070 Super. An RTX 2060 Super has also been launched. Also, an RTX 2080 Super is set for launch in the near future which will replace the 2080 offering at the $700 price point. [Jul '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Out of the box the reference 5700 XT has high burst speeds but under load it overheats and therefore drops frames to the extent that it is more or less unusable for demanding games like PUBG. In order to settle the card it was under volted by 120 mV and the maximum clock was lowered to 1,980 MHz (the stock BIOS and 19.9.1 driver defaulted the card to 2,030 MHz). The fan curve also had to be turned up to around 50% power at 75 degrees (which is a lot noisier than stock). After making these changes the card delivered far more consistent performance albeit with a reduced top speed and unacceptable (hair dryer) levels of noise. There were also incompatibilities with GTAV: enabling reflection MSAA resulted in very poor, almost matt, reflection fidelity (the same bug appeared on several Navi and Vega cards). The reference 5700 XT is great for beating cherry picked benchmarks, but it is not so great for playing games. Thousands of people, duped by sponsored marketing material, purchased the reference card expecting flagship performance, instead they got a shopping trolley with a V6 engine. It appears that the same marketing tactics were employed for the reference Vega 56 and 64 series of graphics cards which we will purchase for our gaming lab and generate effective Fps gaming metrics as soon as possible (results here). AMD appear to have very short term marketing strategists at the helm, they seem more concerned with this years bonuses than the longevity of the brand. [Jul '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) January 2023 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $319Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $457Crucial MX500 250GB $37
Intel Core i3-12100F $98Nvidia RTX 3070 $568Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $106
Intel Core i5-12400F $164Nvidia RTX 3050 $298Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $50SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $49SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $417SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback