CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max
285 EFps Better CSGO EFps.
+24%
229 EFps
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
122 EFps Better GTAV EFps.
+11%
110 EFps
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
154 EFps Better Overwatch EFps.
+12%
138 EFps
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max
145 EFps Better PUBG EFps.
+14%
127 EFps
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
171 EFps Slightly Better Fortnite EFps.
+9%
157 EFps
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 565,948 user samples
330,358 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 135% EVGA(3842 3071)
Worst Bench: 108% Gigabyte(1458 4001)
Poor: 108% Great: 135%
SPEED RANK: 19th / 651
235,590 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 116% XFX(1682 5701)
Worst Bench: 97% XFX(1682 5701)
Poor: 97% Great: 116%
SPEED RANK: 25th / 651
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
123 % Faster effective speed.
+16%
107 %
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
152 fps Better lighting effects.
+13%
134 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
185 fps Much faster multi rendering.
+59%
116 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
132 fps 137 fps +4%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
166 fps Better peak lighting effects.
+13%
147 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
204 fps Much faster peak multi rendering.
+69%
121 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
143 fps 148 fps +3%
Market Share
Based on 35,827,705 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
2.9 % Higher market share.
+17%
2.47 %
Value
Value For Money
57.3 % 63.3 % Better value.
+10%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
178 % Much more popular.
+36%
131 %
Price
Price (score)
$510 $400 Cheaper.
+22%
Age
Newest
16 Months 16 Months
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
209 fps Much better peak reflection handling.
+40%
149 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
170 fps 258 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+52%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
124 fps Faster peak complex splatting.
+25%
99.3 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
157 fps Slightly better reflection handling.
+10%
143 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
150 fps 212 fps Much better texture detail.
+41%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
116 fps Faster complex splatting.
+21%
95.7 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

The RTX 2070 Super replaces the RTX 2070 in Nvidia’s line-up of ray-tracing high performance GPUs, yielding around a 10% performance improvement at the same $500 USD price point. The 2070 Super has been upgraded to use the same GPU die as in the RTX 2080, and now has 2560 CUDA cores, up from 2304 in the 2070. It has a base and boost clock speed of 1605 and 1770 MHz respectively and a 215 W power draw compared to the 185 W per the original 2070. The RTX 2070S also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. The launch of the RTX 2070 Super comes at an exciting time for those in the market for a new graphics card, who can also choose from AMD’s latest first generation RDNA RX 5700 and RX 5700 XT. Some swift maneuvering on price by AMD prior to launch date means that the RX 5700 XT is currently $100 USD cheaper than the 2070 Super. An RTX 2060 Super has also been launched. Also, an RTX 2080 Super is set for launch in the near future which will replace the 2080 offering at the $700 price point. [Jul '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Out of the box the reference 5700 XT has high burst speeds but under load it overheats and therefore drops frames to the extent that it is more or less unusable for demanding games like PUBG. In order to settle the card it was under volted by 120 mV and the maximum clock was lowered to 1,980 MHz (the stock BIOS and 19.9.1 driver defaulted the card to 2,030 MHz). The fan curve also had to be turned up to around 50% power at 75 degrees (which is a lot noisier than stock). After making these changes the card delivered far more consistent performance albeit with a reduced top speed and unacceptable (hair dryer) levels of noise. There were also incompatibilities with GTAV: enabling reflection MSAA resulted in very poor, almost matt, reflection fidelity (the same bug appeared on several Navi and Vega cards). The reference 5700 XT is great for beating benchmarks, but it is not so great for playing games. Thousands of people purchased the reference card expecting flagship performance, instead they got a shopping trolley with a V6 engine. It appears that the same marketing tactics were employed for the reference Vega 56 and 64 series of graphics cards which we will purchase for our gaming lab and generate effective Fps gaming metrics as soon as possible (results here). AMD appear to have very short term marketing strategists at the helm, they seem more concerned with this years bonuses than the longevity of the brand. [Jul '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2020 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $190Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $34
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $260Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $190Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $64SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback