Real World Speed
Performance profile from 111,559 user samples
81,804 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 195% EVGA(3842 2589) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 140% EVGA(3842 2484) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 140% Great: 195%
SPEED RANK: 4th / 628
29,755 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 27% Sapphire(1DA2 E348) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 21% Gigabyte(1458 230A) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 21% Great: 27%
SPEED RANK: 120th / 628
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
175 % Hugely faster effective speed.
+631%
24 %
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
606 fps Hugely better lighting effects.
+639%
82 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
525 fps Hugely faster multi rendering.
+727%
63.5 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
624 fps Hugely faster NBody calculation.
+608%
88.1 fps
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
706 fps Hugely better peak lighting effects.
+599%
101 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
591 fps Hugely faster peak multi rendering.
+778%
67.3 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
700 fps Hugely faster peak NBody calculation.
+593%
101 fps
CSGO
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
263 fps Hugely Better CSGO Fps.
+140%
110 fps
Fortnite
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
197 fps Hugely Better Fortnite Fps.
+277%
52 fps
GTAV
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
140 fps Hugely Better GTAV Fps.
+182%
50 fps
LoL
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
278 fps Hugely Better LoL Fps.
+129%
121 fps
Minecraft
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
303 fps Hugely Better Minecraft Fps.
+146%
123 fps
Market Share
Based on 22,498,584 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.7 % Hugely higher market share.
+673%
0.22 %
Value
Value For Money
38.1 % Better value.
+20%
31.8 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
107 % Much more popular.
+32%
81 %
Price
Price (score)
$1,090 $179 Hugely cheaper.
+84%
Age
Newest
14 Months Much more recent.
+55%
31 Months
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
627 fps Hugely better peak reflection handling.
+626%
86.4 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
833 fps Hugely better peak texture detail.
+517%
135 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
347 fps Hugely faster peak complex splatting.
+322%
82.2 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
559 fps Hugely better reflection handling.
+601%
79.8 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
716 fps Hugely better texture detail.
+507%
118 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
311 fps Hugely faster complex splatting.
+301%
77.6 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

“Build it, and they will come” must be NVIDIA’s thinking behind their latest consumer-focused GPU: the RTX 2080 Ti, which has been released alongside the RTX 2080. Following on from the Pascal architecture of the 1080 series, the 2080 series is based on a new Turing GPU architecture which features Tensor cores for AI (thereby potentially reducing GPU usage during machine learning workloads) and RT cores for ray tracing (rendering more realistic images). Unfortunately, there aren’t (m)any games that make use of these capabilities so the $1200 price tag on the RTX 2080 Ti Founders Edition is difficult to justify. The 2080 Ti also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. On paper the 2080 Ti has 4352 CUDA cores, a base/boost clock of 1350/1545 MHz, 11GB of GDRR6 memory and a memory bandwidth of 616GB/s. The upshot is that it has around a 30% faster effective speed than the 1080 Ti, which at 18 months old continues to offer comparable value for money and currently dominates the high-end gaming market. Professional users such as game developers or 4K gamers may find value in the 2080 Ti but for typical users (@1080p), prices need to drop substantially before the 2080 Ti has much chance of widespread adoption. [Sep '18 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Radeon RX 560 is third in the line up of AMD’s second generation Polaris GPUs aimed at the entry-level 1080p gaming market with a sub-$100 launch price, due for release in May 2017. It is the successor to the now nine month old RX 460. Like the RX 460, it is based on Polaris 11, but comes with all 16 compute units enabled (2 more than in the 460). Coupled with a 6% improvement in boost clock speed from 1200MHz to 1275MHz, a minimum increase in overall effective speed of 10% against the 460 is anticipated. The RX 560 is fresh competition to NVIDIA’s GTX 1050 in terms of price and performance. User benchmarks reveal that NVIDIA’s GTX 1050 is faster than the RX 460 by 17% and so it is expected that the 560 will close most, if not all, of that gap. [May '17 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) December 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $260Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $200AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $369Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback