Real World Speed
Performance profile from 26,276 user samples
11,641 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 233% Asus(1043 866A) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 53% Nvidia(10DE 1E07) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 53% Great: 233%
SPEED RANK: 1st / 599
14,635 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 134% Device(1DA2 E37F) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 73% Asus(1043 04C4)
Poor: 73% Great: 134%
SPEED RANK: 13th / 599
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
196 % Much faster effective speed.
+64%
119 %
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
667 fps Better texture detail.
+28%
522 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
486 fps Hugely faster multi rendering.
+163%
185 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
592 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+62%
365 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
300 fps +4% 288 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
811 fps Better peak texture detail.
+30%
626 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
573 fps Hugely faster peak multi rendering.
+198%
192 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
705 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+69%
418 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
348 fps Slightly faster peak complex splatting.
+14%
304 fps
Market Share
Based on 13,884,064 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.74 % Much higher market share.
+51%
0.49 %
Value
Value For Money
86.9 % +3% 84 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
75 % 78 % +4%
Price
Price (score)
$1,240 $620 Much cheaper.
+50%
Age
Newest
4 Months Much more recent.
+76%
17 Months
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
716 fps Hugely better peak lighting effects.
+94%
369 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
633 fps Hugely better peak reflection handling.
+160%
243 fps
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
567 fps Hugely better lighting effects.
+87%
304 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
528 fps Hugely better reflection handling.
+131%
229 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

“Build it, and they will come” must be NVIDIA’s thinking behind their latest consumer-focused GPU: the RTX 2080 Ti, which has been released alongside the RTX 2080. Following on from the Pascal architecture of the 1080 series, the 2080 series is based on a new Turing GPU architecture which features Tensor cores for AI (thereby potentially reducing GPU usage during machine learning workloads) and RT cores for ray tracing (rendering more realistic images). Unfortunately, there aren’t (m)any games that make use of these capabilities so the $1200 price tag on the RTX 2080 Ti Founders Edition is difficult to justify. On paper the 2080 Ti has 4352 CUDA cores, a base/boost clock of 1350/1545 MHz, 11GB of GDRR6 memory and a memory bandwidth of 616GB/s. The upshot is that it has around a 30% faster effective speed than the 1080 Ti, which at 18 months old continues to offer comparable value for money and currently dominates the high-end gaming market. Professional users such as game developers or 4K gamers may find value in the 2080 Ti but for typical users (@1080p), prices need to drop substantially before the 2080 Ti has much chance of widespread adoption. [Sep '18 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Radeon RX Vega 64 is AMD’s latest Radeon flagship graphics card. It is the first Vega based gaming GPU and follows on from the recent launch of the Vega Frontier Edition. The Vega architecture is built on 14 nm silicon and contains next-generation compute units (nCUs) that have been engineered to be more efficient and powerful than ever before, enabling gamers to achieve higher frame rates at 4K. Each NCU houses 64 steam processors, of which the Vega 64 has 4096 (compared to 3584 in the Vega 56) which can process up to 13.7 TFLOPS (0.6 TFLOPS more than the Frontier Edition) in the liquid cooled version of the GPU. The new architecture also employs 8GB of second generation high-bandwidth memory (HBM2) which is able cope with more data, more quickly than previously. AMD describe this as the most significant leap in their GPU architecture for the last five years. Our graphics benchmarks place the performance of the Vega 64 amongst the best. Its effective speed is very close to that of the twice as expensive Frontier Edition (a workstation GPU with a gaming mode) and just behind NVIDIA’s similarly priced, but now 1 year old GTX 1080. Despite the hopes of AMD enthusiasts, the great performance from the Vega 64 has not been able to exceed the even greater performance from NVIDIA’s GTX 1080 Ti, released earlier this year. The 33% faster 1080 Ti offers better value for money than an RX 64 would even if it were available at its list price of $599. The best prices for RX 64's today are closer to $750 making the RX 64 somewhat redundant until prices drop down to the low $500 mark. [Sep '17 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) January 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $363Nvidia GTX 1070 $350Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $63
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $149Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $250Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $90
Intel Core i5-8600K $260Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $808Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $115SanDisk Extreme 64GB $43
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $780SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $125SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback