Real World Speed
Performance profile from 161,208 user samples
118,395 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 198% EVGA(3842 2487)
Worst Bench: 78% EVGA(3842 2484) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 78% Great: 198%
SPEED RANK: 5th / 635
42,813 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 107% Sapphire(1DA2 E37F) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 87% Asus(1043 04C4)
Poor: 87% Great: 107%
SPEED RANK: 22nd / 635
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
169 % Much faster effective speed.
+74%
97 %
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
583 fps Hugely better lighting effects.
+84%
316 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
514 fps Hugely faster multi rendering.
+173%
188 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
599 fps Much faster NBody calculation.
+58%
378 fps
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
715 fps Hugely better peak lighting effects.
+95%
367 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
590 fps Hugely faster peak multi rendering.
+201%
196 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
708 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.
+68%
421 fps
CSGO
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
263 Fps Better CSGO Fps.
+18%
223 Fps
Fortnite
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
197 Fps Much Better Fortnite Fps.
+62%
121 Fps
PUBG
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
137 Fps Much Better PUBG Fps.
+32%
104 Fps
GTAV
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
140 Fps Much Better GTAV Fps.
+59%
88 Fps
LoL
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
278 Fps Much Better LoL Fps.
+43%
194 Fps
Overwatch
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
139 Fps Slightly Better Overwatch Fps.
+9%
127 Fps
BF1
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
147 Fps Much Better BF1 Fps.
+51%
97 Fps
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
173 Fps Hugely Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Fps.
+97%
88 Fps
Minecraft
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
303 Fps Much Better Minecraft Fps.
+50%
202 Fps
Market Share
Based on 25,779,833 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.38 % Hugely higher market share.
+360%
0.3 %
Value
Value For Money
36.4 % 43.4 % Better value.
+19%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
113 % +3% 110 %
Price
Price (score)
$1,100 $530 Much cheaper.
+52%
Age
Newest
18 Months Much more recent.
+42%
31 Months
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
628 fps Hugely better peak reflection handling.
+155%
246 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
816 fps Much better peak texture detail.
+32%
618 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
347 fps Slightly faster peak complex splatting.
+13%
308 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
535 fps Hugely better reflection handling.
+134%
229 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
681 fps Better texture detail.
+24%
548 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
303 fps +2% 297 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

“Build it, and they will come” must be NVIDIA’s thinking behind their latest consumer-focused GPU: the RTX 2080 Ti, which has been released alongside the RTX 2080. Following on from the Pascal architecture of the 1080 series, the 2080 series is based on a new Turing GPU architecture which features Tensor cores for AI (thereby potentially reducing GPU usage during machine learning workloads) and RT cores for ray tracing (rendering more realistic images). Unfortunately, there aren’t (m)any games that make use of these capabilities so the $1200 price tag on the RTX 2080 Ti Founders Edition is difficult to justify. The 2080 Ti also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. On paper the 2080 Ti has 4352 CUDA cores, a base/boost clock of 1350/1545 MHz, 11GB of GDRR6 memory and a memory bandwidth of 616GB/s. The upshot is that it has around a 30% faster effective speed than the 1080 Ti, which at 18 months old continues to offer comparable value for money and currently dominates the high-end gaming market. Professional users such as game developers or 4K gamers may find value in the 2080 Ti but for typical users (@1080p), prices need to drop substantially before the 2080 Ti has much chance of widespread adoption. [Sep '18 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 is built on 14 nm silicon and contains next-generation compute units (nCUs). Each NCU houses 64 steam processors, of which the Vega 64 has 4096 compared to 3584 in the Vega 56. The architecture also employs 8GB of second generation high-bandwidth memory (HBM2). At launch (two years ago) AMD described this as the most significant leap in their GPU architecture for the last five years. We recently ran the Vega 56 through our EFps lab which showed that in today’s market the Vega series of cards “could” be tempting, at around the $200 mark. (Vega 56 results here)  [Nov '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) March 2020 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $500Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $78SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback