Real World Speed
Performance profile from 792,721 user samples
86,109 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 182% EVGA(3842 2487)
Worst Bench: 94% EVGA(3842 2281)
Poor: 94% Great: 182%
SPEED RANK: 4th / 622
706,612 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 85% Zotac(19DA 1435)
Worst Bench: 69% MSI(1462 3302)
Poor: 69% Great: 85%
SPEED RANK: 33rd / 622
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
157 % Hugely faster effective speed.
+100%
78.3 %
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
701 fps Hugely better texture detail.
+125%
311 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
514 fps Hugely faster multi rendering.
+156%
201 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
609 fps Hugely faster NBody calculation.
+111%
289 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
306 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+37%
224 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
826 fps Hugely better peak texture detail.
+137%
349 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
599 fps Hugely faster peak multi rendering.
+175%
218 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
712 fps Hugely faster peak NBody calculation.
+126%
315 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
346 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.
+41%
245 fps
CSGO
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
265 fps Much Better CSGO Fps.
+34%
198 fps
Fortnite
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
192 fps Much Better Fortnite Fps.
+58%
122 fps
PUBG
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
135 fps Much Better PUBG Fps.
+69%
80 fps
GTAV
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
138 fps Much Better GTAV Fps.
+77%
78 fps
LoL
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
311 fps Much Better LoL Fps.
+48%
211 fps
Overwatch
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
145 fps Better Overwatch Fps.
+26%
115 fps
BF1
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
141 fps Much Better BF1 Fps.
+48%
95 fps
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
169 fps Hugely Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Fps.
+106%
82 fps
Minecraft
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
244 fps Slightly Better Minecraft Fps.
+10%
222 fps
Market Share
Based on 21,504,111 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.54 % 3.92 % Hugely higher market share.
+155%
Value
Value For Money
33 % 50.2 % Much better value.
+52%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
102 % 111 % Slightly more popular.
+9%
Price
Price (score)
$1,126 $370 Much cheaper.
+67%
Age
Newest
13 Months Much more recent.
+68%
41 Months
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
711 fps Hugely better peak lighting effects.
+107%
343 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
629 fps Hugely better peak reflection handling.
+102%
311 fps
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
591 fps Hugely better lighting effects.
+92%
308 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
547 fps Hugely better reflection handling.
+91%
287 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

“Build it, and they will come” must be NVIDIA’s thinking behind their latest consumer-focused GPU: the RTX 2080 Ti, which has been released alongside the RTX 2080. Following on from the Pascal architecture of the 1080 series, the 2080 series is based on a new Turing GPU architecture which features Tensor cores for AI (thereby potentially reducing GPU usage during machine learning workloads) and RT cores for ray tracing (rendering more realistic images). Unfortunately, there aren’t (m)any games that make use of these capabilities so the $1200 price tag on the RTX 2080 Ti Founders Edition is difficult to justify. On paper the 2080 Ti has 4352 CUDA cores, a base/boost clock of 1350/1545 MHz, 11GB of GDRR6 memory and a memory bandwidth of 616GB/s. The upshot is that it has around a 30% faster effective speed than the 1080 Ti, which at 18 months old continues to offer comparable value for money and currently dominates the high-end gaming market. Professional users such as game developers or 4K gamers may find value in the 2080 Ti but for typical users (@1080p), prices need to drop substantially before the 2080 Ti has much chance of widespread adoption. [Sep '18 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The GTX 1070 is Nvidia’s second graphics card (after the 1080) to feature the new 16 nm Pascal architecture. As a result of the die shrink from 28 to 16 nm, Pascal based cards are more energy efficient than their predecessors. The GTX 1070 is rated at just 150 Watts. In terms of performance the gap between the flagship 1080 and 1070 averages 25%. Both GPUs have 8GB of DDR5 and although they share the same processing core (GP104), the 1070 has 25% of its resources disabled. Comparing performance between the 1070 and legendary GTX 970 shows that the newer 1070 wins by a whopping 50%. The GTX 1070 has only just hit the market so, at least for the time being, prices are significantly over the Founders Edition MSRP of $450 but Nvidia have stated that they expect third party cards to sell from $379 at which time the 1070 will likely dominate as the value for money leader[Jun '16 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $148Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $234Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $349Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $260Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $49
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback