Real World Speed
Performance profile from 116,028 user samples
89,506 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 197% MSI(1462 3715)
Worst Bench: 112% EVGA(3842 2387) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 112% Great: 197%
SPEED RANK: 5th / 625
26,522 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 66% MSI(1462 3792)
Worst Bench: 59% MSI(1462 3792)
Poor: 59% Great: 66%
SPEED RANK: 45th / 625
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
171 % Hugely faster effective speed.
+171%
63.2 %
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
591 fps Hugely better lighting effects.
+110%
281 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
516 fps Hugely faster multi rendering.
+251%
147 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
609 fps Hugely faster NBody calculation.
+160%
234 fps
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
718 fps Hugely better peak lighting effects.
+140%
299 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
588 fps Hugely faster peak multi rendering.
+284%
153 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
705 fps Hugely faster peak NBody calculation.
+185%
247 fps
CSGO
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
265 fps Hugely Better CSGO Fps.
+108%
127 fps
Fortnite
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
192 fps Much Better Fortnite Fps.
+61%
119 fps
PUBG
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
135 fps Hugely Better PUBG Fps.
+85%
73 fps
GTAV
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
138 fps Hugely Better GTAV Fps.
+98%
70 fps
LoL
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
311 fps Much Better LoL Fps.
+72%
181 fps
Overwatch
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
145 fps Much Better Overwatch Fps.
+40%
103 fps
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
169 fps Hugely Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Fps.
+179%
60 fps
Minecraft
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
244 fps 283 fps Better Minecraft Fps.
+16%
Market Share
Based on 21,764,556 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.6 % Much higher market share.
+74%
0.92 %
Value
Value For Money
36.9 % 71.3 % Hugely better value.
+93%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
104 % 123 % More popular.
+18%
Price
Price (score)
$1,100 $210 Hugely cheaper.
+81%
Age
Newest
14 Months 8 Months Much more recent.
+43%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
635 fps Hugely better peak reflection handling.
+175%
231 fps
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
834 fps Hugely better peak texture detail.
+212%
267 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
346 fps Hugely faster peak complex splatting.
+89%
183 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
547 fps Hugely better reflection handling.
+151%
218 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
698 fps Hugely better texture detail.
+192%
239 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
305 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+79%
170 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

“Build it, and they will come” must be NVIDIA’s thinking behind their latest consumer-focused GPU: the RTX 2080 Ti, which has been released alongside the RTX 2080. Following on from the Pascal architecture of the 1080 series, the 2080 series is based on a new Turing GPU architecture which features Tensor cores for AI (thereby potentially reducing GPU usage during machine learning workloads) and RT cores for ray tracing (rendering more realistic images). Unfortunately, there aren’t (m)any games that make use of these capabilities so the $1200 price tag on the RTX 2080 Ti Founders Edition is difficult to justify. On paper the 2080 Ti has 4352 CUDA cores, a base/boost clock of 1350/1545 MHz, 11GB of GDRR6 memory and a memory bandwidth of 616GB/s. The upshot is that it has around a 30% faster effective speed than the 1080 Ti, which at 18 months old continues to offer comparable value for money and currently dominates the high-end gaming market. Professional users such as game developers or 4K gamers may find value in the 2080 Ti but for typical users (@1080p), prices need to drop substantially before the 2080 Ti has much chance of widespread adoption. [Sep '18 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

NVIDIA's GTX 1660 follows hot on the heels of last month's release of the GTX 1660 Ti. As the name would suggest, the 1660 is a slightly scaled back version of the 1660 Ti. Both feature NVIDIAs's new TU116 Turing based die, have 6GB of VRAM, are without RTX cores and have a power draw (TDP) of 120W. The main differences arise from the number of CUDA cores: the 1660 has 1408 whilst the 1660 Ti has 1536, and memory bandwidth: the 1660 can deliver 8 Gpbs using ubiquitous GDDR5 (as featured in the GTX 1060 3GB and 6GB) versus the 1660 Ti which can deliver 12 Gpbs using newer, faster and dearer GDDR6. Early benchmarks show that the GTX 1660 has about a 20% lower effective speed than the 1660 Ti, but with an entry price of $219 USD, the 1660 is also about 20% cheaper. Further, the 1660 has a 12% effective speed advantage over the ~$230 USD 6GB 1060 and a similar real world effective speed to AMD's $265 USD RX 590. NVIDIAs strategy of offering great value Turing products at all price tiers can only be good for competition and consumers. [Mar '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $148Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $195AMD RX 590 $185Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $340Nvidia RTX 2060 $325Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $51
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $71SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $609SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback