CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max
293 EFps Much Better CSGO EFps.
+33%
221 EFps
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
136 EFps Hugely Better GTAV EFps.
+89%
72 EFps
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
221 EFps Hugely Better Overwatch EFps.
+166%
83 EFps
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max
174 EFps Hugely Better PUBG EFps.
+120%
79 EFps
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
199 EFps Hugely Better Fortnite EFps.
+97%
101 EFps
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 470,043 user samples
291,832 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 197% Asus(1043 8667)
Worst Bench: 125% MSI(1462 3715)
Poor: 125% Great: 197%
SPEED RANK: 9th / 666
178,211 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 73% EVGA(3842 1067) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 63% Zotac(19DA 2543)
Poor: 63% Great: 73%
SPEED RANK: 66th / 666
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
172 % Hugely faster effective speed.
+151%
68.6 %
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
210 fps Hugely better lighting effects.
+130%
91.4 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
209 fps Hugely better reflection handling.
+125%
92.7 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
253 fps Hugely faster multi rendering.
+286%
65.5 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
212 fps Hugely faster NBody calculation.
+167%
79.4 fps
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
246 fps Hugely better peak lighting effects.
+152%
97.8 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
318 fps Hugely better peak reflection handling.
+150%
127 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
288 fps Hugely faster peak multi rendering.
+313%
69.8 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
243 fps Hugely faster peak NBody calculation.
+191%
83.5 fps
Market Share
Based on 46,274,499 GPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.77 % 0.85 % Higher market share.
+10%
Value
Value For Money
29.6 % 70.6 % Hugely better value.
+138%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
71 % 75 % Slightly more popular.
+6%
Price
Price (score)
$1,376 $230 Hugely cheaper.
+83%
Age
Newest
36 Months 30 Months More recent.
+17%
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
272 fps Hugely better peak texture detail.
+220%
84.9 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
184 fps Hugely faster peak complex splatting.
+146%
74.9 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
230 fps Hugely better texture detail.
+200%
76.6 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
164 fps Hugely faster complex splatting.
+134%
70 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

“Build it, and they will come” must be NVIDIA’s thinking behind their latest consumer-focused GPU: the RTX 2080 Ti, which has been released alongside the RTX 2080. Following on from the Pascal architecture of the 1080 series, the 2080 series is based on a new Turing GPU architecture which features Tensor cores for AI (thereby potentially reducing GPU usage during machine learning workloads) and RT cores for ray tracing (rendering more realistic images). Unfortunately, there aren’t (m)any games that make use of these capabilities so the $1200 price tag on the RTX 2080 Ti Founders Edition is difficult to justify. The 2080 Ti also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. On paper the 2080 Ti has 4352 CUDA cores, a base/boost clock of 1350/1545 MHz, 11GB of GDRR6 memory and a memory bandwidth of 616GB/s. The upshot is that it has around a 30% faster effective speed than the 1080 Ti, which at 18 months old continues to offer comparable value for money and currently dominates the high-end gaming market. Professional users such as game developers or 4K gamers may find value in the 2080 Ti but for typical users (@1080p), prices need to drop substantially before the 2080 Ti has much chance of widespread adoption. [Sep '18 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

NVIDIA's GTX 1660 follows hot on the heels of last month's release of the GTX 1660 Ti. As the name would suggest, the 1660 is a slightly scaled back version of the 1660 Ti. Both feature NVIDIAs's new TU116 Turing based die, have 6GB of VRAM, are without RTX cores and have a power draw (TDP) of 120W. The main differences arise from the number of CUDA cores: the 1660 has 1408 whilst the 1660 Ti has 1536, and memory bandwidth: the 1660 can deliver 8 Gpbs using ubiquitous GDDR5 (as featured in the GTX 1060 3GB and 6GB) versus the 1660 Ti which can deliver 12 Gpbs using newer, faster and dearer GDDR6. The 1660 also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. Early benchmarks show that the GTX 1660 has about a 20% lower effective speed than the 1660 Ti, but with an entry price of $219 USD, the 1660 is also about 20% cheaper. Further, the 1660 has a 12% effective speed advantage over the ~$230 USD 6GB 1060 and a similar real world effective speed to AMD's $265 USD RX 590. NVIDIAs strategy of offering great value Turing products at all price tiers can only be good for competition and consumers. [Mar '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) September 2021 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $72G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback