Real World Speed
Performance profile from 571,976 user samples
357,946 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 174% Gigabyte(1458 37BB) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 128% Asus(1043 8667)
Poor: 128% Great: 174%
SPEED RANK: 26th / 714
214,030 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 87% Zotac(19DA 1396) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 70% EVGA(3842 4995)
Poor: 70% Great: 87%
SPEED RANK: 90th / 714
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
156 % Hugely faster effective speed.
+97%
79 %
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
209 fps Hugely better lighting effects.
+112%
98.6 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
208 fps Hugely better reflection handling.
+81%
115 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
257 fps Hugely faster multi rendering.
+165%
97 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
211 fps Hugely faster NBody calculation.
+116%
97.7 fps
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
239 fps Hugely better peak lighting effects.
+115%
111 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
308 fps Hugely better peak reflection handling.
+133%
132 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
286 fps Hugely faster peak multi rendering.
+172%
105 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
240 fps Hugely faster peak NBody calculation.
+124%
107 fps
CSGO
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
263 Fps Much Better CSGO Fps.
+34%
196 Fps
Fortnite
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
197 Fps Much Better Fortnite Fps.
+63%
121 Fps
PUBG
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
137 Fps Much Better PUBG Fps.
+70%
81 Fps
GTAV
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
140 Fps Much Better GTAV Fps.
+75%
80 Fps
LoL
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
278 Fps Better LoL Fps.
+29%
215 Fps
Overwatch
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
139 Fps Better Overwatch Fps.
+21%
115 Fps
BF1
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
147 Fps Much Better BF1 Fps.
+50%
98 Fps
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
173 Fps Hugely Better The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Fps.
+111%
82 Fps
Minecraft
Avg. Fps @ 1080p on Max
303 Fps Better Minecraft Fps.
+24%
244 Fps
Market Share
Based on 67,425,348 GPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.54 % Hugely higher market share.
+184%
0.19 %
Value
Value For Money
83.6 % Hugely better value.
+150%
33.5 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
72 % Slightly more popular.
+9%
66 %
Price
Price (score)
$441 Cheaper.
+21%
$560
Age
Newest
67 Months Much more recent.
+37%
107 Months
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
268 fps Hugely better peak texture detail.
+137%
113 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
184 fps Hugely faster peak complex splatting.
+89%
97.4 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
231 fps Hugely better texture detail.
+131%
100 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
163 fps Hugely faster complex splatting.
+85%
87.9 fps
ADVERTISEMENT

“Build it, and they will come” must be NVIDIA’s thinking behind their latest consumer-focused GPU: the RTX 2080 Ti, which has been released alongside the RTX 2080. Following on from the Pascal architecture of the 1080 series, the 2080 series is based on a new Turing GPU architecture which features Tensor cores for AI (thereby potentially reducing GPU usage during machine learning workloads) and RT cores for ray tracing (rendering more realistic images). Unfortunately, there aren’t (m)any games that make use of these capabilities so the $1200 price tag on the RTX 2080 Ti Founders Edition is difficult to justify. The 2080 Ti also features Turing NVENC which is far more efficient than CPU encoding and alleviates the need for casual streamers to use a dedicated stream PC. On paper the 2080 Ti has 4352 CUDA cores, a base/boost clock of 1350/1545 MHz, 11GB of GDRR6 memory and a memory bandwidth of 616GB/s. The upshot is that it has around a 30% faster effective speed than the 1080 Ti, which at 18 months old continues to offer comparable value for money and currently dominates the high-end gaming market. Professional users such as game developers or 4K gamers may find value in the 2080 Ti but for typical users (@1080p), prices need to drop substantially before the 2080 Ti has much chance of widespread adoption. [Sep '18 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The new GTX 980 Ti shares the same board as the more expensive Titan-X but with various restrictions including a reduced number of CUDA cores (3072 to 2816, -8.3%). Although the 980 Ti has the same 384-bit memory bandwidth as the Titan-X it only has 6GB of GDDR5 vs. 12GB in the Titan-X. So far we only have one user benchmark from a pre-release unit of the GTX 980 Ti so the following benchmarks are provisional. Comparing the Titan-X and 980 Ti shows that the Ti only lags by around 8%, which is in line with the CUDA core counts on the two cards. On the other hand comparing the GTX 980 and GTX 980 Ti shows that the Ti is around 16% faster. We don't have reliable prices for the GTX 980 Ti yet so a precise value rating isn't possible but as a card aimed at resolutions greater than 1080p it will struggle to match the GTX 970 for the vast majority of users. [May '15 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback