Real World Speed
Performance profile from 57,684 user samples
43,922 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 79% MSI(1462 C979)
Worst Bench: 69% Nvidia(10DE 2507) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 69% Great: 79%
SPEED RANK: 98th / 714
13,762 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 106% AMD(1002 081E)
Worst Bench: 91% AMD(1002 081E)
Poor: 91% Great: 106%
SPEED RANK: 62nd / 714
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed
74.8 % 101 % Much faster effective speed.
+35%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
102 fps 131 fps Better lighting effects.
+28%
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
86.9 fps 112 fps Better reflection handling.
+29%
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere)
83.3 fps 104 fps Faster multi rendering.
+25%
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy)
72.2 fps 153 fps Hugely faster NBody calculation.
+112%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat)
107 fps 140 fps Much better peak lighting effects.
+31%
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot)
115 fps 123 fps Slightly better peak reflection handling.
+7%
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere)
86.5 fps 108 fps Faster peak multi rendering.
+25%
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy)
75.7 fps 161 fps Hugely faster peak NBody calculation.
+113%
Market Share
Based on 67,456,321 GPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.63 % Insanely higher market share.
+6,200%
0.01 %
Value
Value For Money
64.6 % Hugely better value.
+128%
28.4 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
90 % Much more popular.
+53%
59 %
Price
Price (score)
$274 Much cheaper.
+67%
$841
Age
Newest
26 Months Much more recent.
+58%
62 Months
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
98.6 fps 230 fps Hugely better peak texture detail.
+133%
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
67.9 fps 85.6 fps Faster peak complex splatting.
+26%
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones)
89.2 fps 209 fps Hugely better texture detail.
+134%
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm)
64.5 fps 84.1 fps Much faster complex splatting.
+30%
ADVERTISEMENT

The RTX 3050 is built on NVIDIA’s Ampere architecture. It marks the first time that ray-tracing has been available on an entry level (50-series) card. Second generation ray tracing cores can be switched on for more realistic light simulation, albeit at a hit to performance. The 3050 features 2560 CUDA cores, a boost clock frequency of 1.78 GHz, 8 GB of the latest GDDR6 memory and NVIDIA’s DLSS. DLSS technology uses the 3050’s tensor cores to scale up resolutions whilst maintaining high frame rates and without losing significant image quality. The 3050 also includes an encoder (NVENC) for sharper images and smoother capture whilst recording/streaming. The MRSP of entry models is $249 USD, however, street prices are closer to $600 USD. Early benchmarks show that the 3050 only headlines around 50% faster than AMD's 6500 XT whilst street prices for the 3050 are over 100% higher. Many experienced users simply have no interest in buying AMD cards, regardless of price. AMD’s neanderthal marketing tactics seem to have come back to haunt them. Their brazen domination of social media platforms including youtube and reddit resulted in millions of users purchasing sub standard products. Experienced gamers know all too well that high average fps are worthless when they are accompanied with stutters, random crashes, excessive noise and a limited feature set. [Jan '22 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The widely anticipated (albeit currently not widely available) prosumer AMD Radeon VII is finally available. It features a next generation Vega 20 GPU which is based on a 7nm manufacturing process, compared to 14nm in the first generation flagship: the RX Vega 64. The Radeon VII has a massive 16GB of expensive high-bandwidth memory (HBM2) which offers a decent degree of future proofing and also makes it a good choice for memory hungry applications, however most current games do not require more than the 8GB that comes with both NVIDIA's RTX 2080 and AMD’s RX Vega 64. The Radeon VII has fewer cores than the RX Vega 64 (3840 vs 4096) but clock speeds have been boosted up to 1800 MHz compared to 1546 MHz in the RX Vega 64, the net result is 13.8 TFLOPS single precision computations (versus 13.4 TFLOPS for the RX Vega 64). On the negative side, the Radeon VII is designed with three cooling fans which can get noisy and early software drivers are reported to be buggy. Whilst there is a modest 16% performance advantage over the RX Vega 64, initial benchmarks indicate that the Radeon VII has an effective speed which is 6% short of the similarly priced RTX 2080.  [Feb '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback