COMPARE
GPU
RANKINGS
TEST
YOUR GPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD
Nvidia
Nvidia
VS
About
Effective Speed 
+461%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 302,252 user samples
Benchmark your GPU here
43,161 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 255% MSI(1462 5132)
Worst Bench: 208% Gigabyte(1458 40C6)
Poor: 208% Great: 255%
SPEED RANK: 4th / 705
259,091 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 46% MSI(1462 3870) ≥ 4GB
Worst Bench: 39% Zotac(19DA 3595) ≥ 4GB
Poor: 39% Great: 46%
SPEED RANK: 136th / 705
Effective 3D Speed
Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed 		240 % Hugely faster effective speed.
+461% 		42.8 %
Average Score 
+592%
Lighting
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 		348 fps Hugely better lighting effects.
+536% 		54.7 fps
Reflection
Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 		351 fps Hugely better reflection handling.
+504% 		58.1 fps
MRender
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere) 		479 fps Hugely faster multi rendering.
+828% 		51.6 fps
Gravity
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 		299 fps Hugely faster NBody calculation.
+498% 		50 fps
Overclocked Score 
+560%
Lighting
Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 		375 fps Hugely better peak lighting effects.
+537% 		58.9 fps
Reflection
High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 		483 fps Hugely better peak reflection handling.
+522% 		77.6 fps
MRender
Render target array GShader (Sphere) 		512 fps Hugely faster peak multi rendering.
+690% 		64.8 fps
Gravity
NBody particle system (Galaxy) 		315 fps Hugely faster peak NBody calculation.
+492% 		53.2 fps
Value & Sentiment 
+0%
Market Share
Based on 65,862,900 GPUs tested
See market share leaders
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days) 		1.84 % Much higher market share.
+42% 		1.3 %
Value
Value For Money 		75.9 % Better value.
+16% 		65.5 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating 		96 % More popular.
+20% 		80 %
Price
Price (score) 		$750 $155 Much cheaper.
+79%
Nice To Haves 
+431%
Age
Newest 		11 Months Much more recent.
+80% 		55 Months
Parallax
Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 		418 fps Hugely better peak texture detail.
+671% 		54.2 fps
Splatting
Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) 		226 fps Hugely faster peak complex splatting.
+368% 		48.3 fps
Parallax
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 		371 fps Hugely better texture detail.
+653% 		49.3 fps
Splatting
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) 		216 fps Hugely faster complex splatting.
+383% 		44.7 fps
Conclusion 
Average Bench 240%
Average Bench 42.8%
ADVERTISEMENT

The RTX 4070-Ti is based on Nvidia’s Ada Lovelace architecture. It features 7,680 cores with base / boost clocks of 2.3 / 2.6 GHz, 12 GB of memory, a 192-bit memory bus, 60 3rd gen RT cores, 240 4th gen Tensor cores, DLSS 3 (with frame generation), a TDP of 285W and an MSRP of $800 USD. The 4070-Ti is around 50% faster than the 3070-Ti and offers similar performance to the 3090-Ti at less than half the price. Since the 4070-Ti only has 12GB-192-bit memory (vs 24GB-384-bit in the 3090-Ti) it is relatively weaker (5-10%) at 4K. Users tempted to consider the 7900 XT/X by AMD’s army of sponsored Advanced Marketers (youtube, reddit, twitter, forums etc.) should be aware that AMD have a history of releasing benchmark busting, heavily marketed, sub standard products. Although the 7900 XTX does outperform the 4070-Ti on paper, the 4070-Ti is more power efficient (quieter), has a broader feature set (RT/DLSS 3.0) and offers far better game compatibility (drivers). PC gamers still looking to join AMD’s “2%” GPU club (Steam stats: 5000/6000 series combined mkt share) need to work on their critical thinking skills: Influencers are paid handsomely to promote inferior products. Most gamers, who are best off playing at 1080p, should wait for the upcoming, better value, 4060 series cards. Shoppers looking for more affordable options in the near term should consider the previous gen 3060-Ti, which offers excellent real-world performance for $400 USD. [Jan '23 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The GTX 1650 supersedes NVIDIA’s two year old 1050, outperforming it by around 52%. It features a TU117 processor based on the latest Turing architecture, which is a reduced version of the TU116 in the GTX 1660. The 1650 has 896 NVIDIA CUDA Cores, a base/boost clock of 1485/1665 MHz and 4GB of GDDR5 memory running at up to 8Gbps. The reference version has a low (75W) power consumption and higher power variants are available with greater overclocking headroom. At a list price of USD $150, this card is the cheapest Turing based graphics card available, however, in the budget market where “value for money” reigns supreme, AMD’s two year old RX 570 8GB outperforms the 1650 by around 15%, has double the memory (therefore is more future proof) and can often be found cheaper. NVIDIA will have to discount prices significantly in order to draw budget gamers to the GTX 1650. [Apr '19 GPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

User Builds 
43,161
259,091
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) December 2023 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

Computer Components FAQ
What is the UBM value for money rating?
What is UBM Effective Speed?
Thunderbolt speed?
Are USB 3.0 cables different?
Graphics Cards
How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs?
What are the UBM DX11 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX10 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX09 GPU tests?
What is the Splatting GPU benchmark?
What is the Gravity (NBody) GPU benchmark?
What is the MRender GPU benchmark?
What is the parallax (POM) GPU benchmark?
What is the reflection (HDR) GPU benchmark?
What is the lighting (LDPRT) benchmark?
What is the GPU value for money rating?
What is the effective GPU speed index?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $30
Intel Core i5-12400F $149Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $360Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $189Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $340Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $49
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $42SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $50G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $357SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback