Average Bench: 75% (35th of 628)

Based on 10,465 user benchmarks.  Device: 10DE 17C2 Model: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X

The new GTX Titan X is based on the same Maxwell architecture as its market leading sibling, the GTX 980. In terms of specs the Titan X is basically one and a half GTX 980s with 50% more CUDA cores, 50% more texture units and 50% more transistors. Comparing the performance profiles of the GTX 980 and Titan X shows that the Titan X leads by 36% which is broadly proportional to its improved hardware specs. With performance up by 36% and prices up by nearly 100% the Titan X is a hard sell from a value perspective. Two GTX 980s cost roughly the same as one Titan X and in SLI outperform a single Titan X by around 50%. The Titan X obviously isn't aimed at value conscious buyers but if you are in the market for the fastest single consumer graphics card money can buy, then the Titan X will hit the spot perfectly. [Mar '15 GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Good average bench

The Nvidia GTX Titan X averaged 25.0% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 308fps
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 278fps

Very good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Nvidia GTX Titan X is just 19.8%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the Nvidia GTX Titan X performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 282fps
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 316fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 10,465 samples)
Min Avg Max
245 Lighting 308 412
229 Reflection 282 320
251 Parallax 316 369
80.9% 302 fps
Min Avg Max
153 MRender 180 201
238 Gravity 278 311
160 Splatting 186 215
75.1% 215 fps
User Benchmarks Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
Gigabyte(1458 36DC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1557 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 391.35
Lighting 336
Reflection 329
Parallax 360
88% 342 fps
MRender 203
Gravity 316
Splatting 206
85% 242 fps
CLim: 1519 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 441.66
Lighting 311
Reflection 295
Parallax 346
82% 317 fps
MRender 187
Gravity 289
Splatting 186
78% 221 fps
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 441.41
Lighting 268
Reflection 284
Parallax 305
70% 286 fps
MRender 182
Gravity 284
Splatting 193
77% 220 fps
Nvidia(10DE 1132) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1880 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 441.12
Lighting 246
Reflection 231
Parallax 246
65% 241 fps
MRender 150
Gravity 230
Splatting 162
62% 181 fps
10,465 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 22,500,183 GPUs tested.

 Popular Cards

Based on statistics from 10,465 user benchmarks.

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price (Approx. $1000 @ launch in Mar '15)
Nvidia(10DE 1132) 41% 73% ± 5%
EVGA(3842 2992) 23% 79% ± 6%
EVGA GTX TITAN X 12GB SC
12G-P4-2992-KR
BHPhotoUS $1,0963 years
AmazonUS $1,1507 mins
Asus(1043 8539) 20% 73% ± 7%
ASUS GTX TITAN X 12GB
GTXTITANX-12GD5
EVGA(3842 2990) 11% 73% ± 8%
EVGA GTX TITAN X 12GB
12G-P4-2990-KR
EVGA(3842 1999) 2% 82% ± 3%
EVGA(3842 2999) 2% 83% ± 3%
Gigabyte(1458 36DC) 1% 82% ± 6%
Nvidia(10DE 1166) 0% 76% ± 0%
Dell(1028 079A) 0% 77% ± 0%
Dell(1028 068B) 0% 57% ± 0%
Send price feedback
Typical GTX Titan X Builds (Compare 5,993 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE V EXTREME - $310

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $2,285

Popular GTX Titan X compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) December 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added 4 years ago.

Liked

1 month ago.

Comment 

Super Fast and even for this price its worth to having one. It's like a supercar.—May '15


Terrible

11 months ago.

This card overclocked is the same as a GTX 1080, money well spent


Terrible

2 years ago.

expensive and slightly better than 1070


Poor

10 months ago.

A very powerfull graphics card


Poor

12 months ago.

Best GPU I've ever had. If you have the money, go for it!


Outstanding

4 years ago.


Poor

20 months ago.

To whoever bought this before the 980 Ti: Have you learnt your lesson?


Terrible

2 years ago.

very high price & low energy efficiency


Terrible

6 months ago.

Did this even sell?


Excellent

2 years ago.

Comparable to 1070s when overclocked. Lots of vram, which is nice. Good for holding onto until Volta, especially when i got two of them.


Good

11 months ago.

Good for Workstation, and not for Gaming


Your
opinion?
628 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $260Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $200AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $369Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback