Average Bench: 8.15% (246th of 627)

Based on 804 user benchmarks.  Device: 10DE 0E3B Model: NVIDIA Quadro 4000M

Terrible average bench

The Nvidia Quadro 4000M averaged 91.8% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 26.5fps
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 28.3fps

Excellent consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Nvidia Quadro 4000M is just 7.78%. This is an extremely narrow range which indicates that the Nvidia Quadro 4000M performs superbly consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 27.4fps
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 23.6fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 804 samples)
Min Avg Max
4.7 Lighting 26.5 30.9
4.7 Reflection 27.4 31.2
2.9 Parallax 23.6 29.5
6.97% 25.8 fps
Min Avg Max
4.9 MRender 27.2 30.6
4.9 Gravity 28.3 32.3
5.3 Splatting 23.9 27.2
8.23% 26.4 fps
User Benchmarks Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
HP(103C 1630) 2GB
CLim: 475 MHz, MLim: 625 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 353.62
Lighting 30.5
Reflection 30.7
Parallax 28.4
8% 29.9 fps
MRender 29.9
Gravity 31.6
Splatting 26.1
9% 29.2 fps
Dell(1028 04A4) 2GB
CLim: 475 MHz, MLim: 625 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 369.9
Lighting 29.9
Reflection 30.6
Parallax 10.7
8% 23.7 fps
MRender 29.9
Gravity 31.6
Splatting 26.3
9% 29.3 fps
Dell(1028 14A4) 2GB
CLim: 475 MHz, MLim: 625 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 353.62
Lighting 30.2
Reflection 30.8
Parallax 28.5
8% 29.8 fps
MRender 30
Gravity 31.5
Splatting 26.6
9% 29.4 fps
HP(103C 1630) 2GB
CLim: 475 MHz, MLim: 625 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 376.99
Lighting 30.3
Reflection 30
Parallax 28.8
8% 29.7 fps
MRender 30
Gravity 30.7
Splatting 26.3
9% 29 fps
Dell(1028 04A4) 2GB
CLim: 475 MHz, MLim: 625 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 377.11
Lighting 30.4
Reflection 30.8
Parallax 28.7
8% 30 fps
MRender 29.9
Gravity 30.7
Splatting 26.4
9% 29 fps
HP(103C 1630) 2GB
CLim: 475 MHz, MLim: 625 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 376.84
Lighting 30.4
Reflection 30.6
Parallax 28.8
8% 29.9 fps
MRender 29.9
Gravity 30.6
Splatting 26.4
9% 29 fps
HP(103C 1630) 2GB
CLim: 475 MHz, MLim: 625 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 377.61
Lighting 30.2
Reflection 30.7
Parallax 28.3
8% 29.7 fps
MRender 29.5
Gravity 27.2
Splatting 26.3
8% 27.7 fps
804 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 22,405,282 GPUs tested.

 Popular Cards

Based on statistics from 804 user benchmarks.

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price
Dell(1028 04A4) 41% 8% ± 2%
HP(103C 1630) 37% 8% ± 2%
Dell(1028 14A4) 19% 8% ± 2%
HP(103C 0852) 1% 8% ± 3%
HP(103C 176C) 1% 6% ± 4%
Clevo(1558 7100) 0% 5% ± 5%
POV(1ACC 4647) 0% 7% ± 0%
Dell(1028 05CD) 0% 9% ± 0%
Fujitsu(10CF 1634) 0% 9% ± 0%
Nvidia(10DE 4647) 0% 9% ± 0%
Send price feedback
Typical Quadro 4000M Builds (Compare 1,849 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

System: Dell Precision M6600

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 36% - Below average Total price: $406

Popular Quadro 4000M systems:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) December 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

627 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $270Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $200AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $359Nvidia RTX 2060 $324Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback