Average Bench: 72.9% (101st of 714)

Based on 640 user benchmarks.  Device: 10DE 17F0 Model: NVIDIA Quadro M6000

Good average bench

The Nvidia Quadro M6000 averaged 27.1% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 91.6fps
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) 79.7fps

Excellent consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Nvidia Quadro M6000 is just 8.61%. This is an extremely narrow range which indicates that the Nvidia Quadro M6000 performs superbly consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 108fps
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 94.7fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 640 samples)
Min Avg Max
84.9 Lighting 91.6 100
101 Reflection 108 120
83.2 Parallax 94.7 102
74.6% 98 fps
Min Avg Max
80.6 MRender 86.4 90
86.5 Gravity 90.3 92.9
74.7 Splatting 79.7 82.8
69.4% 85.5 fps
User Benchmarks Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
HP(103C 1129) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1152 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 392.68
Lighting 92.9
Reflection 107
Parallax 94.8
76% 98.1 fps
MRender 88.2
Gravity 91.2
Splatting 82.1
71% 87.2 fps
HP(103C 1129) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1152 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 528.24
Lighting 89.5
Reflection 106
Parallax 95.7
73% 97.2 fps
MRender 89.2
Gravity 90.7
Splatting 78.4
70% 86.1 fps
Nvidia(10DE 1129) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1152 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 472.98
Lighting 89.6
Reflection 105
Parallax 93.3
73% 95.9 fps
MRender 86.2
Gravity 90
Splatting 77.1
68% 84.4 fps
Nvidia(10DE 1129) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1152 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 551.86
Lighting 89
Reflection 106
Parallax 94.7
72% 96.5 fps
MRender 88.4
Gravity 88.8
Splatting 79
69% 85.4 fps
HP(103C 1129) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1152 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 353.30
Lighting 89
Reflection 104
Parallax 94.9
72% 95.9 fps
MRender 86.6
Gravity 83.7
Splatting 80.7
68% 83.7 fps
HP(103C 1129) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1152 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 551.52
Lighting 87.8
Reflection 104
Parallax 93.1
72% 95.1 fps
MRender 87.1
Gravity 90.1
Splatting 79.9
70% 85.7 fps
HP(103C 1129) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1152 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 546.01
Lighting 88.6
Reflection 104
Parallax 94.3
72% 95.7 fps
MRender 87.6
Gravity 90.5
Splatting 0.1
42% 59.4 fps
640 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 67,426,491 GPUs tested

 Popular Cards (based on 640 benchmarks)

If you buy via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price
Nvidia(10DE 1129) 57% 73% ± 2%
HP(103C 1129) 41% 73% ± 2%
Nvidia(10DE 1141) 1% 71% ± 3%
Nvidia(10DE 11A0) 0% 68% ± 8%
Send price feedback
Typical Quadro M6000 Builds (Compare 1,946 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship

System: HP Z840 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 118% - Outstanding Total price: $95

Popular Quadro M6000 systems:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.

Excellent

4 years ago.

Very good server card.


Excellent

6 years ago.

Its pretty fast, and its got a big number so it must be fast


Your
opinion?
714 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback