Average Bench: 9.38% (228th of 639)

Based on 1,385 user benchmarks.  Device: 8086 5927 Models: Intel(R) Iris(R) Plus Graphics 650, Intel(R) Iris(TM) Plus Graphics 650

Terrible average bench

The Intel Iris Plus 650 (Mobile Kaby Lake) averaged 90.6% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 33.9fps
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 34.2fps

Excellent consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Intel Iris Plus 650 (Mobile Kaby Lake) is just 5.4%. This is an extremely narrow range which indicates that the Intel Iris Plus 650 (Mobile Kaby Lake) performs superbly consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 31.7fps
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 37.1fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 1,385 samples)
Min Avg Max
16.9 Lighting 33.9 41.1
15.7 Reflection 31.7 33.3
23.6 Parallax 37.1 43.7
8.9% 34.2 fps
Min Avg Max
11.6 MRender 25.2 30.7
18.9 Gravity 34.2 39.8
0.1 Splatting 31.6 44.2
9.43% 30.3 fps
User Benchmarks Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
Intel(8086 2068) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6286
Lighting 22.8
Reflection 16.5
Parallax 29.4
6% 22.9 fps
MRender 27.3
Gravity 40
Splatting 30.9
11% 32.7 fps
Intel(8086 2068) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7262
Lighting 38.1
Reflection 31
Parallax 42.8
10% 37.3 fps
MRender 31.3
Gravity 37.7
Splatting 43.7
11% 37.6 fps
Apple(106B 0175) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4664
Lighting 38.7
Reflection 31.1
Parallax 37.3
10% 35.7 fps
MRender 21.4
Gravity 34.7
Splatting 37.4
9% 31.2 fps
Apple(106B 0175) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7263
Lighting 35.9
Reflection 28.7
Parallax 37.5
9% 34 fps
MRender 28.2
Gravity 32.7
Splatting 38.8
9% 33.2 fps
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8190
Lighting 21.4
Reflection 17.6
Parallax 23.4
6% 20.8 fps
MRender 0.3
Gravity 20.9
Splatting 25.3
5% 15.5 fps
Intel(8086 2068) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6286
Lighting 17.1
Reflection 14.3
Parallax 16.4
4% 15.9 fps
MRender 13
Gravity 16.5
Splatting 18.9
5% 16.1 fps
Intel(8086 2068) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 22.20.16.4836
Lighting 17.8
Reflection 14.2
Parallax 18.6
5% 16.9 fps
MRender 12.1
Gravity 15.5
Splatting 19.5
4% 15.7 fps
1,385 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 28,753,705 GPUs tested.

 Popular Cards

Based on statistics from 1,385 user benchmarks.

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price
Intel(8086 2068) 66% 9% ± 2%
Apple(106B 0175) 30% 10% ± 1%
Intel(8086 2212) 2% 10% ± 2%
Device(1B0A 22C4) 1% 8% ± 2%
Device(15BD 3161) 0% 9% ± 0%
Legend(17AA 2112) 0% 7% ± 0%
Send price feedback
Typical Iris Plus 650 (Mobile Kaby Lake) Builds (Compare 592 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht

Motherboard: Intel NUC7i7BNB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 26% - Poor Total price: $100

Popular Iris Plus 650 (Mobile Kaby Lake) compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2020 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.

Excellent

17 months ago.

Pretty decent integrated graphics!


Good

4 months ago.

Its under performing but at least its good.


Your
opinion?
639 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $165Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9600K $196Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $345Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $500Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $240
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $36Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback