Average Bench: 27.6% (102nd of 625)

Based on 169 user benchmarks.  Device: 10DE 1CBA Model: NVIDIA Quadro P2000 with Max-Q Design

Very poor average bench

The Nvidia Quadro P2000 with Max-Q Design averaged 72.4% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 99.4fps
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 103fps

Excellent consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Nvidia Quadro P2000 with Max-Q Design is just 2.16%. This is an extremely narrow range which indicates that the Nvidia Quadro P2000 with Max-Q Design performs superbly consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 69.3fps
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 105fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 169 samples)
Min Avg Max
83.2 Lighting 99.4 106
62.8 Reflection 69.3 72.4
88.9 Parallax 105 118
26.1% 91.3 fps
Min Avg Max
57.8 MRender 66.9 70.3
98.1 Gravity 103 106
77.8 Splatting 81.5 84.9
27.8% 83.8 fps
User Benchmarks Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
Legend(17AA 2267) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.1616
Lighting 105
Reflection 72
Parallax 106
28% 94.3 fps
MRender 68.8
Gravity 105
Splatting 82.6
28% 85.5 fps
Legend(17AA 2267) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 417.35
Lighting 102
Reflection 71
Parallax 104
27% 92.2 fps
MRender 68.7
Gravity 105
Splatting 84.1
28% 85.9 fps
Legend(17AA 2267) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 417.35
Lighting 103
Reflection 71.2
Parallax 108
27% 93.9 fps
MRender 68.3
Gravity 104
Splatting 84.4
28% 85.7 fps
Legend(17AA 2267) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 431.40
Lighting 101
Reflection 70.2
Parallax 117
26% 95.9 fps
MRender 67.5
Gravity 102
Splatting 83.4
28% 84.5 fps
Legend(17AA 2267) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 431.94
Lighting 97.4
Reflection 0.3
Parallax 117
26% 71.4 fps
MRender 67.6
Gravity 102
Splatting 82
28% 83.8 fps
Legend(17AA 2267) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 417.35
Lighting 0.8
Reflection 69.8
Parallax 105
0% 58.6 fps
MRender 68.8
Gravity 104
Splatting 83.9
28% 85.7 fps
Legend(17AA 2267) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 431.94
Lighting 92.5
Reflection 62
Parallax 86.8
24% 80.4 fps
MRender 59.5
Gravity 89.7
Splatting 71
24% 73.4 fps
169 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 21,764,118 GPUs tested.

 Popular Cards

Based on statistics from 169 user benchmarks.

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price
Legend(17AA 2267) 85% 28% ± 1%
Legend(17AA 2266) 15% 28% ± 1%
Send price feedback
Typical Quadro P2000 with Max-Q Design Builds (Compare 333 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Destroyer

System: Lenovo 20MDCTO1WW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Popular Quadro P2000 with Max-Q Design systems:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.
Your
opinion?
625 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $148Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $195AMD RX 590 $185Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $340Nvidia RTX 2060 $325Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $51
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $71SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $609SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback