Average Bench: 70% (45th of 642)

Based on 98 user benchmarks.  Device: 10DE 1BB9 Model: NVIDIA Quadro P4200 with Max-Q Design

Good average bench

The Nvidia Quadro P4200 with Max-Q Design averaged 29.9% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 260fps
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 261fps

Very good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Nvidia Quadro P4200 with Max-Q Design is just 17.8%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the Nvidia Quadro P4200 with Max-Q Design performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 263fps
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 283fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 98 samples)
Min Avg Max
214 Lighting 260 276
230 Reflection 263 279
226 Parallax 283 328
68.3% 269 fps
Min Avg Max
144 MRender 168 178
211 Gravity 261 282
160 Splatting 185 204
70.4% 205 fps
User Benchmarks Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
Legend(17AA 2268) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 443.32
Lighting 231
Reflection 275
Parallax 296
61% 267 fps
MRender 174
Gravity 276
Splatting 203
74% 217 fps
Legend(17AA 2268) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 443.32
Lighting 266
Reflection 274
Parallax 291
70% 277 fps
MRender 174
Gravity 274
Splatting 200
74% 216 fps
Legend(17AA 2269) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 443.32
Lighting 264
Reflection 273
Parallax 292
69% 277 fps
MRender 172
Gravity 274
Splatting 200
74% 215 fps
Clevo(1558 95E1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.66
Lighting 261
Reflection 267
Parallax 276
68% 268 fps
MRender 172
Gravity 258
Splatting 202
70% 211 fps
Legend(17AA 2269) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 451.48
Lighting 219
Reflection 214
Parallax 216
58% 216 fps
MRender 165
Gravity 251
Splatting 186
68% 201 fps
Clevo(1558 95E1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 452.06
Lighting 238
Reflection 258
Parallax 246
63% 247 fps
MRender 154
Gravity 222
Splatting 180
61% 185 fps
Legend(17AA 2268) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 443.32
Lighting 206
Reflection 232
Parallax 224
54% 220 fps
MRender 144
Gravity 208
Splatting 193
57% 182 fps
Legend(17AA 2269) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.3630
Lighting 208
Reflection 232
Parallax 231
54% 224 fps
MRender 144
Gravity 207
Splatting 177
57% 176 fps
98 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 32,937,572 GPUs tested.

 Popular Cards

Based on statistics from 98 user benchmarks.

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price
Legend(17AA 2269) 62% 70% ± 5%
Legend(17AA 2268) 24% 73% ± 5%
Clevo(1558 95E1) 13% 66% ± 3%
Send price feedback
Typical Quadro P4200 with Max-Q Design Builds (Compare 69 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht

System: Lenovo 20MBCTO1WW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Popular Quadro P4200 with Max-Q Design systems:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) September 2020 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

642 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $193Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $295Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $43
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $66SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $64SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Extreme 16GB $28
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback