Average Bench: 16% (241st of 715)

Based on 6,357 user benchmarks.  Device: 10DE 11E0 Model: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M

Terrible average bench

The Nvidia GTX 770M averaged 84.0% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 18.7fps
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) 18.3fps

Excellent consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Nvidia GTX 770M is just 2.61%. This is an extremely narrow range which indicates that the Nvidia GTX 770M performs superbly consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 19.9fps
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 23.7fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 6,357 samples)
Min Avg Max
17.3 Lighting 18.7 19.6
18 Reflection 19.9 26.9
19.5 Parallax 23.7 24.9
15.3% 20.7 fps
Min Avg Max
21.3 MRender 22.7 23.5
22.3 Gravity 24.2 24.9
11.8 Splatting 18.3 19.6
17.5% 21.7 fps
User Benchmarks Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
MSI(1462 10E8) 3GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 22.21.13.8205
Lighting 19
Reflection 19.2
Parallax 24.1
16% 20.8 fps
MRender 22.5
Gravity 23.7
Splatting 18.7
17% 21.6 fps
Asus(1043 213E) 3GB
CLim: 862 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 425.31
Lighting 18.5
Reflection 19.1
Parallax 23.8
15% 20.5 fps
MRender 22.9
Gravity 24.3
Splatting 19
18% 22.1 fps
Asus(1043 213E) 3GB
CLim: 862 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 425.31
Lighting 18.4
Reflection 19.2
Parallax 23.6
15% 20.4 fps
MRender 22.6
Gravity 24
Splatting 19.1
18% 21.9 fps
Dell(1028 05AD) 3GB
CLim: 862 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 425.31
Lighting 18.4
Reflection 18.7
Parallax 23.7
15% 20.3 fps
MRender 21.9
Gravity 24.4
Splatting 19
18% 21.8 fps
Asus(1043 213E) 3GB
CLim: 862 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 425.31
Lighting 18.4
Reflection 19
Parallax 23.6
15% 20.3 fps
MRender 22
Gravity 24.4
Splatting 18.9
18% 21.8 fps
Toshiba(1179 FA77) 3GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.1972
Lighting 18.6
Reflection 18.5
Parallax 23.6
15% 20.2 fps
MRender 21.7
Gravity 23.5
Splatting 18.5
17% 21.2 fps
Dell(1028 05AA) 3GB
CLim: 862 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 425.31
Lighting 18.5
Reflection 18.1
Parallax 22.8
15% 19.8 fps
MRender 21.4
Gravity 23.7
Splatting 18.7
17% 21.3 fps
Toshiba(1179 FA77) 3GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.2606
Lighting 18.4
Reflection 19.3
Parallax 24.1
15% 20.6 fps
MRender 22.3
Gravity 23.5
Splatting 18.6
17% 21.5 fps
Asus(1043 213E) 3GB
CLim: 862 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 425.31
Lighting 17.6
Reflection 18.6
Parallax 22.4
14% 19.5 fps
MRender 22.8
Gravity 24.3
Splatting 19.1
18% 22.1 fps
6,357 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 67,936,730 GPUs tested

 Popular Cards (based on 6,357 benchmarks)

If you buy via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price
Asus(1043 213E) 44% 16% ± 1%
MSI(1462 10E8) 13% 16% ± 1%
Toshiba(1179 FA77) 12% 16% ± 0%
Dell(1028 05AA) 7% 16% ± 1%
Asus(1043 21BB) 6% 16% ± 0%
Dell(1028 05AB) 4% 16% ± 1%
Dell(1028 05AD) 4% 16% ± 1%
Dell(1028 05AE) 3% 16% ± 1%
Clevo(1558 5106) 2% 16% ± 1%
Clevo(1558 7104) 1% 16% ± 1%
Dell(1028 02A2) 1% 15% ± 2%
Gigabyte(1458 2552) 0% 14% ± 0%
Clevo(1558 0376) 0% 17% ± 0%
HP(103C 1630) 0% 16% ± 0%
Dell(1028 15CD) 0% 16% ± 0%
Nvidia(10DE 1008) 0% 18% ± 0%
Clevo(1558 0270) 0% 16% ± 0%
Dell(1028 043A) 0% 18% ± 0%
Send price feedback
Typical GTX 770M Builds (Compare 382 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Asus G750JX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $370

Popular GTX 770M systems:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) July 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.

Good

7 months ago.

Aside from the lack of dx12 support, this efficient beast has served me for nearly 9 years, hoping to upgrade soon


Excellent

5 years ago.

Medion Erazer 2013 & still using thad shjid 2018


Your
opinion?
715 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $259WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $119
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $325Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $418
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback