Average Bench: 3.36% (440th of 681)

Based on 20,559 user benchmarks.  Device: 10DE 0DE1 Models: NVIDIA GeForce GT 430, WinFast GT 430(NVIDIA)

Terrible average bench

The Nvidia GeForce GT 430 averaged 96.6% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 3.85fps
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 4.43fps

Excellent consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Nvidia GeForce GT 430 is just 1.08%. This is an extremely narrow range which indicates that the Nvidia GeForce GT 430 performs superbly consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 5.4fps
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 1.4fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 20,559 samples)
Min Avg Max
3.19 Lighting 3.85 4.5
3 Reflection 5.4 6.9
0.9 Parallax 1.4 2
3.1% 3.55 fps
Min Avg Max
2.4 MRender 5.05 6.4
4 Gravity 4.43 4.9
1.29 Splatting 3.1 3.7
3.67% 4.19 fps
User Benchmarks Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
Gigabyte(1458 3505) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
Lighting 4.1
Reflection 6.5
Parallax 1.2
3% 3.93 fps
MRender 6.1
Gravity 4.8
Splatting 4.4
4% 5.1 fps
Gigabyte(1458 3505) 1GB
CLim: 730 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Lighting 4.1
Reflection 6.4
Parallax 1.9
3% 4.13 fps
MRender 6
Gravity 4.6
Splatting 3.4
4% 4.67 fps
Zotac(19DA 2199) 1GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 333 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 5.2
Parallax 1.3
3% 3.47 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 4.2
Splatting 3.3
4% 4.17 fps
MSI(1462 2302) 1GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 333 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 382.05
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 3.6
Parallax 1.6
3% 2.93 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 4.2
Splatting 2.8
3% 3.33 fps
EVGA(3842 1430) 1,024MB
Ram: 1,023MB, Driver: 320.18
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 5.6
Parallax 0.7
3% 3.37 fps
MRender 5.4
Gravity 2.9
Splatting 3.3
3% 3.87 fps
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 267 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Lighting 3.3
Reflection 3.1
Parallax 1.2
3% 2.53 fps
MRender 2.4
Gravity 4
Splatting 2.2
3% 2.87 fps
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Lighting 2
Reflection 3.3
Parallax 0.7
2% 2 fps
MRender 2.8
Gravity 2
Splatting 2
2% 2.27 fps
20,559 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 53,403,713 GPUs tested.

 Popular Cards

Based on statistics from 20,559 user benchmarks.

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price
Device(0000 0000) 19% 3% ± 1%
Asus(1043 836D) 13% 3% ± 0%
Gigabyte(1458 3505) 9% 4% ± 0%
Gigabyte(1458 3534) 6% 3% ± 0%
Gigabyte(1458 3519) 5% 3% ± 0%
PNY(196E 0828) 5% 3% ± 0%
EVGA(3842 1430) 4% 3% ± 0%
Nvidia(10DE 0828) 4% 3% ± 0%
MSI(1462 2304) 4% 4% ± 0%
Zotac(19DA 1167) 3% 3% ± 0%
EVGA(3842 1335) 3% 3% ± 0%
Gainward(10B0 0401) 2% 3% ± 0%
Zotac(19DA 4301) 2% 3% ± 0%
MSI(1462 230A) 2% 3% ± 0%
Gigabyte(1458 3506) 2% 3% ± 0%
Asus(1043 83C3) 2% 3% ± 0%
Zotac(19DA 2199) 2% 4% ± 2%
MSI(1462 2302) 2% 3% ± 0%
Asus(1043 83B8) 1% 4% ± 2%
MSI(1462 8093) 1% 4% ± 2%
EVGA(3842 1431) 1% 3% ± 0%
Zotac(19DA 1672) 1% 3% ± 0%
MSI(1462 2309) 1% 3% ± 0%
Zotac(19DA 4199) 1% 3% ± 0%
Device(107D 2730) 1% 3% ± 0%
EVGA(3842 1432) 1% 3% ± 0%
Nvidia(10DE 0000) 1% 3% ± 0%
POV(1ACC 30A3) 1% 3% ± 0%
XFX(1682 300C) 1% 3% ± 0%
Gainward(10B0 1401) 1% 3% ± 0%
PNY(196E 0829) 1% 3% ± 0%
MSI(1462 2305) 0% 3% ± 0%
Gigabyte(1458 3511) 0% 3% ± 0%
POV(1ACC 4312) 0% 3% ± 0%
Device(7377 0000) 0% 3% ± 0%
Sanyo(144D 8093) 0% 3% ± 0%
XFX(1682 300D) 0% 3% ± 0%
POV(1ACC 30A5) 0% 3% ± 0%
MSI(1462 2306) 0% 4% ± 0%
Send price feedback
Typical GeForce GT 430 Builds (Compare 51,912 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $326

Popular GeForce GT 430 systems:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) July 2022 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.

Good (edit your comment) Add link

27 days ago.

it's a quite good vga card for 2010-2016 games


Good

28 days ago.

beacuse this card is very wrong


Good

16 months ago.

2 core processor combo is lamentable


Average

16 months ago.

Its okay for "upgrade" a old pc. But its not a gaming card


Terrible

10 months ago.

Even games that were released in 2008 are lagging in this GPU, which is a little bit strange because it was released in 2014 or 2011, which means it has to make a 2008 game (Spider-Man: Web of Shadows for example) playable, not laggy.


Poor

20 months ago.

still can play game


Poor

15 months ago.

about %13 better than an intel hd 4000 mobile. Its mostly good for internet browsing or work if you want a cheap computer.


Your
opinion?
681 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $280Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-12400F $170Nvidia RTX 3050 $250Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $118
Intel Core i7-12700K $380Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $33Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $71G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $470SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback