Average Bench: 3.06% (494th of 714)

Based on 22,369 user benchmarks.  Device: 10DE 0DE1 Models: NVIDIA GeForce GT 430, WinFast GT 430(NVIDIA)

Terrible average bench

The Nvidia GeForce GT 430 averaged 96.9% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 3.68fps
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere) 4.78fps

Excellent consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Nvidia GeForce GT 430 is just 1.46%. This is an extremely narrow range which indicates that the Nvidia GeForce GT 430 performs superbly consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 5.04fps
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 1.37fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 22,369 samples)
Min Avg Max
2.6 Lighting 3.68 4.4
2.7 Reflection 5.04 6.9
0.6 Parallax 1.37 2
3% 3.36 fps
Min Avg Max
2.3 MRender 4.78 6
3.1 Gravity 4.21 4.66
1.9 Splatting 3.07 3.7
3.2% 4.02 fps
User Benchmarks Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
MSI(1462 2304) 1GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 6
Parallax 1.3
3% 3.73 fps
MRender 5.9
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 3.3
4% 4.5 fps
Sanyo(144D 8093) 1GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 5.7
Parallax 1.3
3% 3.63 fps
MRender 5.5
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 3.3
4% 4.37 fps
Asus(1043 836D) 1GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 5.4
Parallax 1.8
3% 3.7 fps
MRender 5.5
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 3.3
4% 4.37 fps
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 5.6
Parallax 1.3
3% 3.57 fps
MRender 5.5
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 3.2
3% 4.33 fps
Asus(1043 836D) 1GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 4.9
Parallax 1.2
3% 3.27 fps
MRender 5.6
Gravity 4.4
Splatting 3.3
4% 4.43 fps
PNY(196E 0828) 1GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 4.8
Parallax 1.2
3% 3.23 fps
MRender 5.5
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 3.3
4% 4.37 fps
Asus(1043 83B8) 1GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 5.8
Parallax 1.2
3% 3.57 fps
MRender 5.5
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 3.2
3% 4.33 fps
Asus(1043 836D) 1GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 5.4
Parallax 1
3% 3.33 fps
MRender 5.2
Gravity 4.2
Splatting 3.3
3% 4.23 fps
Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 305 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35
Lighting 1.2
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 0.5
1% 1.2 fps
MRender 1.7
Gravity 1.6
Splatting 1.1
1% 1.47 fps
22,369 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 67,427,561 GPUs tested

 Popular Cards (based on 22,369 benchmarks)

If you buy via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price
Device(0000 0000) 21% 3% ± 1%
Asus(1043 836D) 14% 3% ± 0%
Nvidia(10DE 0828) 8% 3% ± 0%
Gigabyte(1458 3505) 6% 3% ± 0%
Gigabyte(1458 3534) 5% 3% ± 0%
Gigabyte(1458 3519) 4% 3% ± 0%
Gainward(10B0 0401) 4% 3% ± 0%
PNY(196E 0828) 3% 3% ± 0%
MSI(1462 2304) 3% 4% ± 0%
Zotac(19DA 4301) 3% 3% ± 0%
MSI(1462 2302) 2% 3% ± 0%
EVGA(3842 1430) 2% 3% ± 0%
MSI(1462 8093) 2% 3% ± 0%
Gigabyte(1458 3506) 2% 3% ± 0%
Zotac(19DA 1167) 2% 3% ± 0%
EVGA(3842 1335) 2% 3% ± 0%
Asus(1043 83B8) 1% 3% ± 0%
MSI(1462 230A) 1% 3% ± 0%
Asus(1043 83C3) 1% 3% ± 0%
POV(1ACC 30A3) 1% 3% ± 0%
XFX(1682 300C) 1% 2% ± 0%
MSI(1462 2309) 1% 3% ± 0%
Nvidia(10DE 0000) 1% 3% ± 0%
Zotac(19DA 4199) 1% 3% ± 0%
Zotac(19DA 2199) 1% 3% ± 1%
Device(107D 2730) 1% 3% ± 0%
XFX(1682 300D) 1% 2% ± 0%
Zotac(19DA 1672) 1% 3% ± 1%
PNY(196E 0829) 1% 3% ± 0%
EVGA(3842 1431) 1% 3% ± 0%
EVGA(3842 1432) 1% 3% ± 0%
Zotac(19DA 1231) 1% 3% ± 0%
Gainward(10B0 1401) 0% 3% ± 0%
POV(1ACC 43C2) 0% 2% ± 0%
POV(1ACC 30A4) 0% 3% ± 0%
Gigabyte(1458 3511) 0% 3% ± 0%
POV(1ACC 4313) 0% 3% ± 0%
Sanyo(144D 8093) 0% 4% ± 0%
Asus(1043 838F) 0% 3% ± 0%
MSI(1462 2305) 0% 3% ± 0%
POV(1ACC 30A5) 0% 2% ± 0%
MSI(1462 2306) 0% 3% ± 0%
Send price feedback
Typical GeForce GT 430 Builds (Compare 24,223 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325

Popular GeForce GT 430 systems:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.

Good (edit your comment) Add link

17 months ago.

it's a quite good vga card for 2010-2016 games


Good

11 months ago.

beacuse this card is very wrong


Good

3 years ago.

2 core processor combo is lamentable


Average

3 years ago.

Its okay for "upgrade" a old pc. But its not a gaming card


Poor

3 years ago.

still can play game


Poor

3 years ago.

about %13 better than an intel hd 4000 mobile. Its mostly good for internet browsing or work if you want a cheap computer.


Your
opinion?
714 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback