Average Bench: 3.68% (367th of 627)

Based on 12,904 user benchmarks.  Device: 10DE 0DE1 Models: NVIDIA GeForce GT 430, WinFast GT 430(NVIDIA)

Terrible average bench

The Nvidia GeForce GT 430 averaged 96.3% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 12.3fps
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 13.1fps

Excellent consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Nvidia GeForce GT 430 is just 1.26%. This is an extremely narrow range which indicates that the Nvidia GeForce GT 430 performs superbly consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 12.5fps
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 10.4fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 12,904 samples)
Min Avg Max
9.1 Lighting 12.3 14.5
9.4 Reflection 12.5 14.5
3.8 Parallax 10.4 12.6
3.23% 11.7 fps
Min Avg Max
5.35 MRender 11.1 13.8
11.3 Gravity 13.1 14.5
4.5 Splatting 6.86 8
3.73% 10.4 fps
User Benchmarks Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
Gigabyte(1458 3505) 1GB
CLim: 730 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Lighting 13.6
Reflection 13.9
Parallax 11.6
4% 13 fps
MRender 13.2
Gravity 13.5
Splatting 7.4
4% 11.4 fps
Gigabyte(1458 3534) 2GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Lighting 12.9
Reflection 13.3
Parallax 3.8
3% 10 fps
MRender 11.9
Gravity 13
Splatting 7.1
4% 10.7 fps
PNY(196E 0828) 1GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 378.78
Lighting 12.8
Reflection 13
Parallax 12
3% 12.6 fps
MRender 12.3
Gravity 12.8
Splatting 7.1
4% 10.7 fps
Zotac(19DA 4301) 1GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Lighting 13
Reflection 12.7
Parallax 11.2
3% 12.3 fps
MRender 12
Gravity 12.7
Splatting 7.1
4% 10.6 fps
Gigabyte(1458 3534) 2GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Lighting 12.5
Reflection 12.6
Parallax 10.9
3% 12 fps
MRender 12
Gravity 12.6
Splatting 7
4% 10.5 fps
Nvidia(10DE 0828) 1GB
CLim: 910 MHz, MLim: 435 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 390.77
Lighting 1.4
Reflection 11
Parallax 5.9
0% 6.1 fps
MRender 7
Gravity 12.4
Splatting 5.9
3% 8.43 fps
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 267 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Lighting 9.8
Reflection 9.8
Parallax 11.2
3% 10.3 fps
MRender 5.3
Gravity 11.8
Splatting 4.6
3% 7.23 fps
Device(7377 0000) 1GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
Lighting 9.3
Reflection 9
Parallax 10.9
2% 9.73 fps
MRender 5.1
Gravity 11.6
Splatting 4.4
3% 7.03 fps
12,904 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 22,407,234 GPUs tested.

 Popular Cards

Based on statistics from 12,904 user benchmarks.

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price
Device(0000 0000) 19% 3% ± 1%
Gigabyte(1458 3505) 12% 4% ± 0%
Asus(1043 836D) 12% 4% ± 1%
Gigabyte(1458 3534) 6% 4% ± 0%
Gigabyte(1458 3519) 4% 4% ± 2%
Gainward(10B0 0401) 4% 3% ± 0%
Nvidia(10DE 0828) 4% 3% ± 1%
MSI(1462 2304) 4% 4% ± 0%
PNY(196E 0828) 3% 4% ± 0%
EVGA(3842 1335) 3% 3% ± 0%
MSI(1462 8093) 3% 3% ± 0%
EVGA(3842 1430) 2% 4% ± 0%
Gigabyte(1458 3506) 2% 4% ± 0%
Zotac(19DA 2199) 2% 4% ± 0%
Zotac(19DA 1167) 2% 4% ± 0%
MSI(1462 2302) 2% 3% ± 0%
Asus(1043 83B8) 2% 4% ± 0%
Zotac(19DA 4301) 1% 4% ± 0%
Zotac(19DA 4199) 1% 6% ± 4%
Nvidia(10DE 0000) 1% 4% ± 0%
MSI(1462 230A) 1% 4% ± 0%
MSI(1462 2309) 1% 4% ± 0%
Zotac(19DA 1672) 1% 4% ± 0%
XFX(1682 300C) 1% 3% ± 0%
Asus(1043 83C3) 1% 3% ± 0%
EVGA(3842 1431) 1% 4% ± 0%
Gainward(10B0 1401) 1% 4% ± 0%
PNY(196E 0829) 1% 3% ± 0%
EVGA(3842 1432) 0% 4% ± 0%
Device(107D 2730) 0% 4% ± 0%
Zotac(19DA 1231) 0% 3% ± 0%
POV(1ACC 30A2) 0% 4% ± 0%
Device(7377 0000) 0% 3% ± 0%
Sanyo(144D 8093) 0% 4% ± 0%
MSI(1462 2305) 0% 4% ± 0%
MSI(1462 2306) 0% 4% ± 0%
POV(1ACC 4313) 0% 3% ± 0%
POV(1ACC 4312) 0% 3% ± 0%
EVGA(3842 1330) 0% 3% ± 0%
POV(1ACC 30A3) 0% 4% ± 0%
XFX(1682 300D) 0% 3% ± 0%
XFX(1682 300B) 0% 3% ± 0%
Gigabyte(1458 3511) 0% 4% ± 0%
Send price feedback
Typical GeForce GT 430 Builds (Compare 48,022 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $253

Popular GeForce GT 430 systems:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) December 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.

Poor (edit your comment) Add link

2 months ago.

Reasonable speeds for an affordable price in a low profile card. If you have the extra money, definitely get a more modern model but you're getting what you pay for.


Good

2 months ago.

beacuse this card is very wrong


Your
opinion?
627 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $270Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $200AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $359Nvidia RTX 2060 $324Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback