Average Bench: 6.2% (306th of 648)

Based on 1,649 user benchmarks.  Device: 10DE 0E3A Model: NVIDIA Quadro 3000M

Terrible average bench

The Nvidia Quadro 3000M averaged 93.7% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 20.2fps
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 21.4fps

Excellent consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Nvidia Quadro 3000M is just 0.44%. This is an extremely narrow range which indicates that the Nvidia Quadro 3000M performs superbly consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 21.6fps
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 16.9fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 1,649 samples)
Min Avg Max
14.8 Lighting 20.2 21.9
19.1 Reflection 21.6 22.5
6.7 Parallax 16.9 20.3
5.3% 19.6 fps
Min Avg Max
20.4 MRender 21.1 21.6
20.7 Gravity 21.4 22.1
20.1 Splatting 20.5 21.7
6.3% 21 fps
User Benchmarks Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
Dell(1028 04A4) 2GB
CLim: 450 MHz, MLim: 625 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 353.62
Lighting 21.7
Reflection 22.3
Parallax 19.7
6% 21.2 fps
MRender 21.2
Gravity 21.7
Splatting 21.3
6% 21.4 fps
Dell(1028 04A4) 2GB
CLim: 450 MHz, MLim: 625 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 369.09
Lighting 21.8
Reflection 22.3
Parallax 19.9
6% 21.3 fps
MRender 21.1
Gravity 21.7
Splatting 21.3
6% 21.4 fps
HP(103C 1630) 2GB
CLim: 450 MHz, MLim: 625 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 377.83
Lighting 21.8
Reflection 22.3
Parallax 20.1
6% 21.4 fps
MRender 21.4
Gravity 21.1
Splatting 21.2
6% 21.2 fps
HP(103C 1630) 2GB
CLim: 450 MHz, MLim: 625 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 377.83
Lighting 21.8
Reflection 22.3
Parallax 19.8
6% 21.3 fps
MRender 21.1
Gravity 21.1
Splatting 21.3
6% 21.2 fps
HP(103C 1630) 2GB
CLim: 450 MHz, MLim: 625 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 377.83
Lighting 21.7
Reflection 22.2
Parallax 19.7
6% 21.2 fps
MRender 21.1
Gravity 21.1
Splatting 21.3
6% 21.2 fps
HP(103C 1630) 2GB
CLim: 450 MHz, MLim: 625 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 377.83
Lighting 18.5
Reflection 18.8
Parallax 19.8
5% 19 fps
MRender 21.1
Gravity 19.5
Splatting 20.8
6% 20.5 fps
1,649 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 34,342,125 GPUs tested.

 Popular Cards

Based on statistics from 1,649 user benchmarks.

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price
HP(103C 1630) 38% 6% ± 0%
Dell(1028 04A4) 36% 6% ± 0%
Dell(1028 14A4) 21% 6% ± 0%
Fujitsu(10CF 1633) 3% 6% ± 0%
HP(103C 0851) 1% 6% ± 0%
Dell(1028 053F) 0% 6% ± 0%
Dell(1028 05CD) 0% 6% ± 0%
HP(103C 176C) 0% 6% ± 0%
Dell(1028 04BA) 0% 6% ± 0%
HP(103C 1520) 0% 6% ± 0%
Send price feedback
Typical Quadro 3000M Builds (Compare 553 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Precision M6600

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $185

Popular Quadro 3000M systems:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) October 2020 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.

Average

17 months ago.

Still a good card, even if it a 2GB Video card. I recommand it for work


Your
opinion?
648 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $199Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9400F $143Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $260Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $510Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Extreme 16GB $28
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback