Average Bench: 7.69% (250th of 621)

Based on 1,266 user benchmarks.  Device: 10DE 11BE Model: NVIDIA Quadro K3000M

Terrible average bench

The Nvidia Quadro K3000M averaged 92.3% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 25.7fps
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 30.4fps

Excellent consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Nvidia Quadro K3000M is just 6.74%. This is an extremely narrow range which indicates that the Nvidia Quadro K3000M performs superbly consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 20.6fps
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 32fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 1,266 samples)
Min Avg Max
5.8 Lighting 25.7 28.9
4.6 Reflection 20.6 22.7
8.15 Parallax 32 35.9
6.9% 26.1 fps
Min Avg Max
5.8 MRender 24.2 26.4
7 Gravity 30.4 34.1
7.8 Splatting 29.4 32.7
8.7% 28 fps
User Benchmarks Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
HP(103C 176C) 2GB
CLim: 653 MHz, MLim: 700 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 425.51
Lighting 28.5
Reflection 22.8
Parallax 35.8
8% 29 fps
MRender 26.3
Gravity 33.9
Splatting 32.4
10% 30.9 fps
HP(103C 176C) 2GB
CLim: 653 MHz, MLim: 700 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 385.73
Lighting 28.3
Reflection 22.4
Parallax 35.2
8% 28.6 fps
MRender 26
Gravity 33.7
Splatting 32.2
10% 30.6 fps
HP(103C 176C) 2GB
CLim: 653 MHz, MLim: 700 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 385.73
Lighting 28.4
Reflection 22.5
Parallax 34.5
8% 28.5 fps
MRender 25.7
Gravity 33.6
Splatting 32
10% 30.4 fps
HP(103C 176C) 2GB
CLim: 653 MHz, MLim: 700 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 419.72
Lighting 28
Reflection 22.5
Parallax 35.1
8% 28.5 fps
MRender 26
Gravity 33.7
Splatting 32.2
10% 30.6 fps
Dell(1028 04A4) 2GB
CLim: 653 MHz, MLim: 700 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 416.78
Lighting 28.1
Reflection 22.5
Parallax 35.4
8% 28.7 fps
MRender 26
Gravity 33.4
Splatting 32.1
10% 30.5 fps
HP(103C 176C) 2GB
CLim: 653 MHz, MLim: 700 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 419.72
Lighting 28
Reflection 22.5
Parallax 34.9
8% 28.5 fps
MRender 26.1
Gravity 33.3
Splatting 32.2
10% 30.5 fps
1,266 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 19,363,876 GPUs tested.

 Popular Cards

Based on statistics from 1,266 user benchmarks.

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price
HP(103C 176C) 59% 8% ± 1%
Dell(1028 153F) 17% 7% ± 2%
Dell(1028 053F) 17% 7% ± 3%
HP(103C 0950) 2% 8% ± 1%
Fujitsu(10CF 1760) 1% 8% ± 1%
Dell(1028 04A4) 1% 7% ± 3%
Dell(1028 0550) 1% 8% ± 0%
Dell(1028 05CD) 1% 4% ± 4%
HP(103C 1630) 0% 8% ± 0%
Dell(1028 14A4) 0% 8% ± 0%
MSI(1462 10EB) 0% 3% ± 0%
Clevo(1558 7102) 0% 7% ± 0%
Clevo(1558 7104) 0% 9% ± 0%
Send price feedback
Typical Quadro K3000M Builds (Compare 1,100 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft

System: HP EliteBook 8770w

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $353

Popular Quadro K3000M systems:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) August 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.

Excellent

10 days ago.

I use and is super nice


Your
opinion?
621 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1660 $220Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $86
Intel Core i5-9600K $219Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $269Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $102
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 $198AMD RX 5700 XT $400Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $97
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $42G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $695SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback