Average Bench: 8.06% (279th of 661)

Based on 2,209 user benchmarks.  Device: 10DE 11BE Model: NVIDIA Quadro K3000M

Terrible average bench

The Nvidia Quadro K3000M averaged 91.9% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 11fps
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 8.93fps

Excellent consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Nvidia Quadro K3000M is just 1.95%. This is an extremely narrow range which indicates that the Nvidia Quadro K3000M performs superbly consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 9.29fps
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 10.8fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 2,209 samples)
Min Avg Max
7.23 Lighting 8.93 9.6
6.81 Reflection 9.29 11.4
8.72 Parallax 10.8 11.6
7.23% 9.66 fps
Min Avg Max
10 MRender 12.4 12.8
8.67 Gravity 11 11.4
10.4 Splatting 12.6 14.1
9.07% 12 fps
User Benchmarks Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
HP(103C 176C) 2GB
CLim: 653 MHz, MLim: 700 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 385.73
Lighting 8.8
Reflection 10.5
Parallax 11.3
7% 10.2 fps
MRender 12.7
Gravity 11.4
Splatting 10.5
9% 11.5 fps
HP(103C 176C) 2GB
CLim: 653 MHz, MLim: 700 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 426.78
Lighting 8.7
Reflection 11.3
Parallax 11.3
7% 10.4 fps
MRender 12.8
Gravity 11.3
Splatting 10.6
9% 11.6 fps
HP(103C 176C) 2GB
CLim: 653 MHz, MLim: 700 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 426.78
Lighting 8.6
Reflection 11.3
Parallax 11.3
7% 10.4 fps
MRender 12.7
Gravity 11.3
Splatting 0.2
9% 8.07 fps
HP(103C 176C) 2GB
CLim: 653 MHz, MLim: 700 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 426.50
Lighting 8.2
Reflection 10.4
Parallax 11.3
7% 9.97 fps
MRender 12.4
Gravity 11.3
Splatting 10.5
9% 11.4 fps
HP(103C 176C) 2GB
CLim: 653 MHz, MLim: 700 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 350.12
Lighting 8.4
Reflection 11.4
Parallax 10.9
7% 10.2 fps
MRender 12.8
Gravity 8.7
Splatting 10.5
8% 10.7 fps
HP(103C 176C) 2GB
CLim: 653 MHz, MLim: 700 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 426.50
Lighting 6.7
Reflection 9
Parallax 9.1
5% 8.27 fps
MRender 10.4
Gravity 8.8
Splatting 8.3
7% 9.17 fps
HP(103C 176C) 2GB
CLim: 653 MHz, MLim: 700 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 350.12
Lighting 7
Reflection 9
Parallax 10.6
6% 8.87 fps
MRender 10.5
Gravity 6.8
Splatting 8.3
6% 8.53 fps
2,209 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 42,566,349 GPUs tested.

 Popular Cards

Based on statistics from 2,209 user benchmarks.

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price
HP(103C 176C) 69% 8% ± 1%
Dell(1028 053F) 13% 9% ± 2%
Dell(1028 153F) 12% 8% ± 1%
HP(103C 0950) 2% 8% ± 0%
Fujitsu(10CF 1760) 2% 8% ± 1%
Dell(1028 04A4) 1% 8% ± 0%
Dell(1028 043A) 0% 8% ± 1%
Dell(1028 14A4) 0% 7% ± 0%
Clevo(1558 7104) 0% 7% ± 0%
HP(103C 176B) 0% 7% ± 0%
HP(103C 197A) 0% 8% ± 0%
Send price feedback
Typical Quadro K3000M Builds (Compare 860 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8770w

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $420

Popular Quadro K3000M systems:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) May 2021 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.

Average

5 months ago.

It's bad af but still runs minecraft on 180 fps no probs doe wtf


Your
opinion?
661 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $196Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $50
Intel Core i5-11600K $255Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $216Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $40
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $102SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback