Average Bench: 0.26% (585th of 627)

more Based on 8,717 user benchmarks.  Device: 1002 9712 Models: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4250, ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4250 Graphics, AMD M880G with ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4200, AMD M880G with ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4250, ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4200, ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4200 Series

Terrible average bench

The ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4250 averaged 99.7% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 1.8fps
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 0.57fps

Excellent consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4250 is just 0.16%. This is an extremely narrow range which indicates that the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4250 performs superbly consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 3.26fps
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 1.04fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 8,717 samples)
Min Avg Max
0.6 Lighting 1.8 3.1
1.9 Reflection 3.26 4
0.4 Parallax 1.04 1.6
0.47% 2.03 fps
Min Avg Max
1 MRender 1.77 2.1
0.3 Gravity 0.57 1
1.47 Splatting 2.67 3.2
0.27% 1.67 fps
User Benchmarks Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
Sanyo(144D C584) 256MB
Driver: atiumdag.dll Ver. 8.632.1.2000
Lighting 1.7
Reflection 3.2
Parallax 1.5
0% 2.13 fps
MRender 1.8
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 2.6
0% 1.73 fps
Acer(1025 036E) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.1100
Lighting 1.8
Reflection 2.9
Parallax 1.3
0% 2 fps
MRender 1.7
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 2.6
0% 1.7 fps
HP(103C 3635) 336MB
Driver: atiumd64.dll Ver. 8.635.0.0
Lighting 1.7
Reflection 3.7
Parallax 1.1
0% 2.17 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 0.6
Splatting 3.2
0% 1.93 fps
HP(103C 3638) 320MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.7000
Lighting 1.9
Reflection 3.5
Parallax 1.5
0% 2.3 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 3
0% 1.77 fps
HP(103C 1697) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Lighting 1.9
Reflection 3.2
Parallax 1.3
0% 2.13 fps
MRender 1.8
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 2.7
0% 1.63 fps
HP(103C 1697) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Lighting 1.8
Reflection 3.1
Parallax 1.3
0% 2.07 fps
MRender 1.8
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 2.8
0% 1.67 fps
Acer(1025 043D) 336MB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Lighting 2
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 0.4
0% 1.63 fps
MRender 1.5
Gravity 0.3
Splatting 2.1
0% 1.3 fps
8,717 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 22,335,598 GPUs tested.

 Popular Cards

Based on statistics from 8,717 user benchmarks.

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price
HP(103C 1444) 7% 0% ± 0%
Sony(104D 9077) 6% 0% ± 0%
Acer(1025 0489) 6% 0% ± 0%
Acer(1025 036E) 5% 0% ± 0%
HP(103C 1475) 5% 0% ± 0%
HP(103C 1604) 5% 0% ± 0%
HP(103C 363F) 4% 0% ± 0%
Acer(1025 0388) 4% 0% ± 0%
Toshiba(1179 FDE4) 4% 0% ± 0%
Dell(1028 0479) 3% 0% ± 0%
HP(103C 1455) 3% 0% ± 0%
Toshiba(1179 FD3C) 3% 0% ± 0%
Toshiba(1179 FD00) 3% 0% ± 0%
HP(103C 144E) 2% 0% ± 0%
HP(103C 143B) 2% 0% ± 0%
Asus(1043 1B62) 2% 0% ± 0%
Legend(17AA 3949) 2% 0% ± 0%
HP(103C 2AAE) 2% 0% ± 0%
Toshiba(1179 FD18) 2% 0% ± 0%
HP(103C 1609) 2% 0% ± 0%
HP(103C 2AAC) 1% 0% ± 0%
Toshiba(1179 FF1F) 1% 0% ± 0%
HP(103C 1660) 1% 0% ± 0%
HP(103C 142C) 1% 0% ± 0%
Asus(1043 1CC2) 1% 0% ± 0%
HP(103C 1664) 1% 0% ± 0%
Acer(1025 0292) 1% 0% ± 0%
HP(103C 165C) 1% 0% ± 0%
HP(103C 1442) 1% 0% ± 0%
HP(103C 1697) 1% 0% ± 0%
Dell(1028 0487) 1% 0% ± 0%
Toshiba(1179 FDD0) 1% 0% ± 0%
HP(103C 3638) 1% 0% ± 0%
HP(103C 3642) 1% 0% ± 0%
HP(103C 148B) 1% 0% ± 0%
Dell(1028 0477) 1% 0% ± 0%
HP(103C 143C) 1% 0% ± 0%
Acer(1025 048B) 1% 0% ± 0%
Acer(1025 0350) 0% 0% ± 0%
Acer(1025 0429) 0% 0% ± 0%
Toshiba(1179 FDB0) 0% 0% ± 0%
Toshiba(1179 FDF4) 0% 0% ± 0%
Toshiba(1179 FD30) 0% 0% ± 0%
Acer(1025 0294) 0% 0% ± 0%
HP(103C 143F) 0% 0% ± 0%
HP(103C 307E) 0% 0% ± 0%
HP(103C 164C) 0% 0% ± 0%
HP(103C 1661) 0% 0% ± 0%
Dell(1028 044B) 0% 0% ± 0%
HP(103C 366A) 0% 0% ± 0%
Send price feedback
Typical Mobility Radeon HD 4250 Builds (Compare 2,020 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: HP G62 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 27% - Poor Total price: $231

Popular Mobility Radeon HD 4250 systems:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) December 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.

Poor (edit your comment) Add link

2 months ago.

This is a terrible graphics card. It can't run any games (even half-life 2 struggles to maintain 60FPS), and it can't stream any YouTube videos above 720p60 or 1080p30. This might be a good idea if you only use email and facebook, otherwise get just about anything else.


Average

10 months ago.


Your
opinion?
627 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $244Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $200AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $360Nvidia RTX 2060 $324Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $58SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback