Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	35.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-5300U 29,898 User benchmarks, average bench 42% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	61% Good	Memory 82.2 1-Core 92.6 2-Core 162 67% 112 Pts	4-Core 232 8-Core 232 31% 232 Pts	64-Core 232 14% 232 Pts
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 61% Great: 56%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD FirePro M4150 109 User benchmarks, average bench 6% HP(103C 2259) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 24.20.11016.4 Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	3.65% Terrible	Lighting 4.5 Reflection 4.77 Parallax 5.28 4% 4.85 fps	MRender 4.43 Gravity 3.83 Splatting 4.83 4% 4.36 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.65% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SDLFNCAR-960G-1HA2 960GB 30 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 178GB free (System drive) Firmware: ZZ37RC93 SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 41 40 41 41 41 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	35.3% Below average	Read 189 Write 40.9 Mixed 72.4 SusWrite 40.7 19% 85.7 MB/s	4K Read 23.7 4K Write 14.9 4K Mixed 18 67% 18.9 MB/s	DQ Read 173 DQ Write 40.7 DQ Mixed 68 60% 93.9 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 35.3% Great: 95%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B1G73BH0-YK0 M471B5173EB0-YK0 12GB 35 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	51% Above average	MC Read 17.7 MC Write 20 MC Mixed 16 51% 17.9 GB/s	SC Read 13.3 SC Write 14.4 SC Mixed 14.9 41% 14.2 GB/s	Latency 76.5 52% 76.5 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 51% Great: 55%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)IntelBench 4%, 231,498 samples	28x

SSD
SD6PP4M-256G-1006 256GBSandiskBench 81%, 1,500 samples	4x
SD7SB3Q-256G-1006 256GBSandiskBench 81%, 1,387 samples	2x
hynix SC300 2.5 7MM 128GBSKBench 64%, 561 samples	2x

RAM
M471B1G73QH0-YK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 52%, 22,647 samples	2x
M471B1G73EB0-YK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 52%, 10,651 samples	2x
HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 1x8GBHynixBench 28%, 77,702 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16