Asrock Z270 Taichi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics32.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive31.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (64%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock Z270 Taichi  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161228
Uptime76 Days
Run DateSep 08 '18 at 15:42
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU 64%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G4600-$27
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
58.7% Above average
Memory 79.9
1-Core 82.1
2-Core 127
60% 96.3 Pts
4-Core 207
8-Core 283
31% 245 Pts
64-Core 300
19% 300 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 390.77
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
32.1% Below average
Lighting 40.3
Reflection 31.2
Parallax 37.7
33% 36.4 fps
MRender 38.5
Gravity 37.9
Splatting 36.2
31% 37.5 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel X25-M 80GB
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2CV102HD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 53 52 35 48 43 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
31.3% Below average
Read 145
Write 58
Mixed 70.6
SusWrite 47.1
18% 80.2 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 27.6
4K Mixed 10.5
62% 20.1 MB/s
DQ Read 151
DQ Write 59
DQ Mixed 40.9
47% 83.7 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 44%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
410GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 196 211 211 212 212 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
88.5% Excellent
Read 353
Write 341
Mixed 310
SusWrite 201
68% 302 MB/s
4K Read 36.4
4K Write 85.1
4K Mixed 52.2
167% 57.9 MB/s
DQ Read 246
DQ Write 182
DQ Mixed 212
159% 213 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 134%
WD Red 6TB (2014)-$129
5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 164 164 166 164 161 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
93.9% Outstanding
Read 166
Write 158
Mixed 93.3
SusWrite 161
106% 145 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
204% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 93.9%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL16-16-16 D4-2400 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
66% Good
MC Read 24.8
MC Write 26.5
MC Mixed 20.7
69% 24 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 21
SC Mixed 17.5
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 80.8
50% 80.8 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 66%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z270 Taichi Builds (Compare 316 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asrock Z270 Taichi

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $500
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback