Acer AST150/ASE350/APM5

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 5% Tree trunk	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	The RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Acer AST150/ASE350/APM5 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer GRS482M
Memory	1.6 GB free of 1 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20050909
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 05 '16 at 08:10
Run Duration	616 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Sempron 3000+-$35 276 User benchmarks, average bench 27% Socket 939, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	21.3% Poor	Memory 38.4 1-Core 26.1 2-Core 26 22% 30.2 Pts	4-Core 26.2 8-Core 25.6 4% 25.9 Pts	64-Core 24.9 2% 24.9 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 21.3% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 3450 4,621 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Dell(1028 0342) 256MB Driver: atidxx32 Ver. 8.56.1.16 Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	0.72% Terrible	Lighting 0.8 Reflection 1.62 Parallax 0.56 1% 0.99 fps	MRender 1.14 Gravity 0.33 Splatting 1.48 1% 0.98 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.72% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Maxtor STM3160215A 160GB 629 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 134GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3.AAD Max speed: UDMA 100 100 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 119 100 234750215 (03) Spinup time 98 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 52 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 66 60 4334019 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 60 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 52 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 61 57 656343079 (C2) HDA temperature 39 43 73014444071 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 84 77 66572562 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	39.2% Below average	Read 67.7 Write 68.8 Mixed 64.4 50% 67 MB/s	4K Read 0.59 4K Write 1.35 4K Mixed 0.41 95% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 39.2% Great: 41%
Hds72808 0PLA380 82GB 291 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 68GB free Firmware: PF2O Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	30.3% Below average	Read 54.2 Write 51 Mixed 34 34% 46.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.69 4K Write 1.65 4K Mixed 0.37 100% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 30.3% Great: 30%
SAMSUNG HD503HI 500GB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 466GB free, PID 0216 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	8.14% Terrible	Read 12.5 Write 10.9 Mixed 11.6 15% 11.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.42 4K Write 1.25 4K Mixed 0.27 53% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 8.14% Great: 24%
LGE LGL25 SD card 34GB 31GB free, PID null Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	6.78% Terrible	Read 13.2 Write 3.46 Mixed 5.56 8% 7.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.23 4K Write 1.25 4K Mixed 0.001 47% 0.82 MB/s

LGE LGL25 Internal 9GB 7GB free, PID null Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	7.9% Terrible	Read 13.4 Write 9.77 Mixed 11.5 14% 11.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.25 4K Write 1.15 4K Mixed 0.63 65% 1.01 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x0.5GB 3,675 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 2 of 4 slots used 1GB 12h Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	5.72% Terrible	MC Read 1.7 MC Write 1.5 MC Mixed 1.5 4% 1.57 GB/s	SC Read 1.7 SC Write 1.5 SC Mixed 1.6 5% 1.6 GB/s	Latency 210 19% 210 ns
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.72% Great: 15%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Acer AST150/ASE350/APM5

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)