Asus P5K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.8%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics59.3% is a reasonable 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive29.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
2 months ago, 2 months ago.
MotherboardAsus P5K  (all builds)
Memory1.6 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20070703
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 11 '18 at 17:35
Run Duration303 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$136
LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
22.8% Poor
SC Int 50.2
SC Float 27.3
SC Mixed 36.2
30% 37.9 Pts
QC Int 154
QC Float 74.5
QC Mixed 111
26% 113 Pts
MC Int 198
MC Float 97.9
MC Mixed 108
21% 135 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 22.8%
Great: 35%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$200
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
59.3% Above average
Lighting 170
Reflection 151
Parallax 151
50% 157 fps
MRender 134
Gravity 180
Splatting 150
66% 155 fps
Poor: 58%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 73%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$89
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 112 98 114 95 105 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
29.2% Poor
Read 148
Write 138
Mixed 128
SusWrite 109
29% 131 MB/s
4K Read 11.5
4K Write 18.1
4K Mixed 15
46% 14.9 MB/s
DQ Read 30
DQ Write 59.2
DQ Mixed 37.9
31% 42.4 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 116%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$58
469GB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 110 105 133 107 122 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
79% Very good
Read 158
Write 110
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 117
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 79%
Great: 114%
Samsung Flash Drive 64GB
17GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 53 52 70 67 73 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
28.8% Poor
Read 102
Write 0.5
Mixed 24.5
SusWrite 54.4
49% 45.4 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 1.3
72% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 6GB
null MHz
2048, 1024, 2048, 1024 MB
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
12.3% Very poor
MC Read 5.4
MC Write 3.7
MC Mixed 3.8
12% 4.3 GB/s
SC Read 1.4
SC Write 1.8
SC Mixed 2
5% 1.73 GB/s
Latency 172
23% 172 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.3%
Great: 45%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical P5K Builds (Compare 1,349 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P5K - $92

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 38% - Below average Total price: $293
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $340Nvidia GTX 1070 $330Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $77
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $130Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $220Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $100
Intel Core i5-8600K $237Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $770Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $130SanDisk Extreme 64GB $43
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $869SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $130SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback