Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 41% Speed boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	4.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	62.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Toshiba Satellite S55D-A (all builds)
Motherboard	AMD VG10AD
Memory	3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130619
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 12 '18 at 18:41
Run Duration	119 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	28%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-5745M APU 6,689 User benchmarks, average bench 36% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	39.1% Below average	Memory 61 1-Core 43.5 2-Core 74.9 39% 59.8 Pts	4-Core 102 8-Core 107 14% 104 Pts	64-Core 118 7% 118 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 39.1% Great: 44%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8610G 5,188 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Toshiba(1179 FA40) 768MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1101.0 Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	4.05% Terrible	Lighting 4.93 Reflection 6.46 Parallax 5.12 4% 5.51 fps	MRender 3.86 Gravity 4.43 Splatting 6.22 4% 4.84 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.05% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 128GB-$70 18,195 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 101GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 247 256 274 277 281 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	62.4% Good	Read 377 Write 272 Mixed 269 SusWrite 260 66% 295 MB/s	4K Read 15 4K Write 44.3 4K Mixed 20.6 73% 26.6 MB/s	DQ Read 219 DQ Write 184 DQ Mixed 202 151% 202 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 62.4% Great: 119%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273EB0-YK0 2x4GB 950 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 800 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	22.1% Poor	MC Read 10.1 MC Write 4.4 MC Mixed 8.3 22% 7.6 GB/s	SC Read 5.1 SC Write 4.5 SC Mixed 6.7 16% 5.43 GB/s	Latency 125 32% 125 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 22.1% Great: 58%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16