| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 3.26% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
Very high background CPU (88%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 70% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
| System | Lenovo 20354 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | LENOVO Lancer 5A5 |
| Memory | 3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 8.1 |
| BIOS Date | 20140410 |
| Uptime | 23.5 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 13 '18 at 17:50 |
| Run Duration | 111 Seconds |
| Run User | ROU-User |
| Background CPU | 88% |
| CPU Throttled | 70% |
PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-4210U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
|
38.8%
Below average
|
40% 66 Pts
|
19% 144 Pts
|
11% 170 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Legend(17AA 380D) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3379
|
3.26%
Terrible
|
3% 4.16 fps
|
4% 4.16 fps
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
46.2%
Average
|
50% 17.5 GB/s
|
29% 10.1 GB/s
|
27% 148 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 20354 Builds (Compare 2,073 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Lenovo 20354
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-4510UIntelBench 47%, 63,054 samples | 1,033x |
| Core i5-4210UIntelBench 41%, 82,966 samples | 858x |
| Core i3-4030UIntelBench 45%, 24,177 samples | 81x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 275,372 samples | 1,550x |
| GeForce 840MNvidiaBench 9%, 20,978 samples | 394x |
| GeForce GT 820MNvidiaBench 4%, 958 samples | 101x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 21% - Poor | Total price: $28 |