Acer AOD270

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 7.45%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.04% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 10 years and 7 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
SystemAcer AOD270  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer JE01_CT
Memory1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1024 x 600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120112
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateSep 13 '18 at 19:11
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Atom N2800
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.85 GHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
7.45% Terrible
1-Core 12.5
2-Core 24.6
9% 18.5 Pts
4-Core 37.9
8-Core 36.9
5% 37.4 Pts
64-Core 38.6
3% 38.6 Pts
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.45%
Great: 8%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator 3600
Acer(1025 061F)
Driver: igdumd32.dll Ver. 8.14.8.1075
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
0.04% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 2
Parallax 1.9
1% 2.53 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.04%
Great: 0%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus 5400.6 2.5" 500GB-$30
248GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 4.8 5.2 5.6 5.5 5.4 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 8% Great: 43%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Adata AD73I1C1674EV 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 666 MHz clocked @ 1066 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled
13.7% Very poor
MC Read 5.4
MC Write 4.4
MC Mixed 3.5
13% 4.43 GB/s
SC Read 2.8
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 3.2
10% 3.47 GB/s
Latency 145
28% 145 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 29%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical AOD270 Builds (Compare 205 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 15%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Acer AOD270

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 22% - Poor Total price: $51
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $356Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti $155Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $683SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback