Asus F2A85-M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics51.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus F2A85-M  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140711
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 13 '18 at 23:40
Run Duration211 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 28%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-6600K APU-$88
FM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
49.9% Average
Memory 71.1
1-Core 64
2-Core 120
52% 84.9 Pts
4-Core 164
8-Core 186
23% 175 Pts
64-Core 193
12% 193 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1411 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.5.1
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.3% Above average
Lighting 61.9
Reflection 70.5
Parallax 83
50% 71.8 fps
MRender 71.5
Gravity 66.3
Splatting 59.2
53% 65.7 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
93GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 740 276 264 219 220 218 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
164GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 106 106 107 106 100 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
67.6% Good
Read 130
Write 112
Mixed 65.2
SusWrite 105
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
223% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
71GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 164 164 167 167 154 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
90.2% Outstanding
Read 152
Write 142
Mixed 84.6
SusWrite 162
99% 135 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
233% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 109%
WD WD5000AACS-00ZUB0 500GB
138GB free
Firmware: 05.04C05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 74 74 74 74 71 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
46.7% Average
Read 88.8
Write 81
Mixed 57.2
SusWrite 73.6
55% 75.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Kingston KHX1866C9D3/8GX 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
26.3% Poor
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 6.1
MC Mixed 7.9
27% 9.5 GB/s
SC Read 2.2
SC Write 3.8
SC Mixed 5.9
11% 3.97 GB/s
Latency 98.8
40% 98.8 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical F2A85-M Builds (Compare 66 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F2A85-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $147
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback