PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 15.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | Packard ixtreme M5860 (all builds) |
Motherboard | Packard ixtreme M5860 |
Memory | 13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20110809 |
Uptime | 0.8 Days |
Run Date | Sep 16 '18 at 16:24 |
Run Duration | 126 Seconds |
Run User | CHE-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
74.1%
Very good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 650-Ti-$152
Asus(1043 842B) 1GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
|
15.3%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
212GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 306 409 417 419 418 418 MB/s
|
101%
Outstanding
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
689GB free
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 118 118 117 118 118 MB/s
|
66.8%
Good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unifosa HU564403EP0200 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
|
52%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-2600Intel $197Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 45x |
Core i5-2320Intel $165Bench 64%, 38,345 samples | 7x |
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 5x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GeForce GT 530NvidiaBench 3%, 5,672 samples | 13x |
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 11x |
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 5x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 74% - Very good | Total price: $197 |