Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 13% Tree trunk	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 9.81%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	3.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	21.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (98%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4500U-$393 39,249 User benchmarks, average bench 50% N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	9.81% Terrible	Memory 6.77 1-Core 17.1 2-Core 33.1 10% 19 Pts	4-Core 68.8 8-Core 112 11% 90.4 Pts	64-Core 77.3 5% 77.3 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 9.81% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz) 275,372 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Sony(104D 90B1) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	3.65% Terrible	Lighting 3.77 Reflection 6.19 Parallax 6.12 3% 5.36 fps	MRender 7.14 Gravity 2.23 Splatting 7.57 5% 5.65 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.65% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZNTD128HAGM-00000 128GB 882 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 5GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXT2400Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 27 26 27 23 22 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	21.3% Poor	Read 205 Write 58.2 Mixed 63.7 SusWrite 26.9 19% 88.5 MB/s	4K Read 8.3 4K Write 10.5 4K Mixed 1.2 20% 6.67 MB/s	DQ Read 236 DQ Write 39.3 DQ Mixed 46 57% 107 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 21.3% Great: 68%
Generic- SD/MMC/MS PRO 64GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 4GB free, PID 0176 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 37 25 36 36 36 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	10.9% Very poor	Read 15.8 Write 11 Mixed 34.5 SusWrite 31.5 34% 23.2 MB/s	4K Read 5.9 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 1.8 86% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 10.9% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	26.6% Poor	MC Read 8.3 MC Write 14.5 MC Mixed 10.3 32% 11 GB/s	SC Read 1.3 SC Write 3.5 SC Mixed 1.7 6% 2.17 GB/s	Latency 435 9% 435 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 26.6% Great: 65%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16