Lenovo 2349LT5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemLenovo 2349LT5  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 2349LT5
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20180605
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 26 '18 at 18:00
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3320M-$199
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
58.3% Above average
Memory 79.7
1-Core 91.1
2-Core 157
65% 109 Pts
4-Core 216
8-Core 216
29% 216 Pts
64-Core 218
14% 218 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Legend(17AA 21F3) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4425
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
4% Terrible
Lighting 4.43
Reflection 5.88
Parallax 3.03
4% 4.45 fps
MRender 5.43
Gravity 2.47
Splatting 8.43
5% 5.44 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 301 140 143 143 144 142 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Read 459
Write 428
Mixed 298
SusWrite 169
76% 338 MB/s
4K Read 30.3
4K Write 44.1
4K Mixed 24.1
100% 32.8 MB/s
DQ Read 306
DQ Write 295
DQ Mixed 167
162% 256 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6EFR8C-PB 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
56.9% Above average
MC Read 20.9
MC Write 20.6
MC Mixed 18.2
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 17.7
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 81.2
49% 81.2 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback