Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom 9650-$125 2,698 User benchmarks, average bench 43% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	48.3% Average	Memory 75.2 1-Core 34.1 2-Core 68 40% 59.1 Pts	4-Core 127 8-Core 126 17% 127 Pts	64-Core 131 8% 131 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 48.3% Great: 50%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD WD6400AACS-00G8B1 640GB 9,045 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 13GB free (System drive) Firmware: 05.04C05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 43 52 51 52 52 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	24.3% Poor	Read 36 Write 36.8 Mixed 24.8 SusWrite 48.7 27% 36.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.2 51% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 24.3% Great: 49%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	24.1% Poor	MC Read 9.9 MC Write 5.4 MC Mixed 8.9 23% 8.07 GB/s	SC Read 5.1 SC Write 4.5 SC Mixed 6.5 15% 5.37 GB/s	Latency 90 44% 90 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 24.1% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 39%

Jet ski

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

GPU
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	3x
Radeon HD 4300ATIBench 1%, 14,988 samples	3x
Radeon HD 5450AMDBench 1%, 66,079 samples	2x

SSD
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	2x
520 Series 240GBIntel $139Bench 78%, 12,595 samples	1x
HG6 mSATA 128GBToshibaBench 71%, 3,217 samples	1x

Value: 11% - Very poor

Total price: $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16