bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics31.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive30.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
System
MotherboardIntel DH61WW
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121221
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 03 '18 at 18:01
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User PRY-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3330
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
68.9% Good
Memory 84.4
1-Core 81.2
2-Core 164
65% 110 Pts
4-Core 314
8-Core 296
41% 305 Pts
64-Core 311
19% 311 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
CLim: 1604 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 411.70
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
31.2% Below average
Lighting 39.5
Reflection 36.5
Parallax 33
32% 36.3 fps
MRender 37.4
Gravity 34.8
Splatting 35.2
29% 35.8 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PU1000064GBATSSD 64GB
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS.51.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 117 138 124 111 98 MB/s
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
30.4% Below average
Read 243
Write 181
Mixed 97.8
SusWrite 124
36% 161 MB/s
4K Read 15.4
4K Write 10.5
4K Mixed 9.9
42% 11.9 MB/s
DQ Read 13.6
DQ Write 11.2
DQ Mixed 9.4
8% 11.4 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 44%
Seagate ST3250310AS 250GB-$44
55GB free
Firmware: 3.AAC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 78 83 81 80 81 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
47.2% Average
Read 83.5
Write 84.7
Mixed 48
SusWrite 80.8
54% 74.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
137% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 54%
Samsung M3 Portable 500GB
156GB free, PID 61b3
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 27 28 28 28 28 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
16.3% Very poor
Read 32
Write 26.5
Mixed 23.5
SusWrite 27.8
37% 27.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-052.A00LF 99U5471-040.A00LF 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
51.1% Above average
MC Read 18
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 16.6
51% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 14.4
SC Mixed 15.5
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 72.9
55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,225 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback