| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 24.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 52.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| System | HP Z620 Workstation (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 158A |
| Memory | 55.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit couleurs |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20120717 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 06 '18 at 14:22 |
| Run Duration | 124 Seconds |
| Run User | FRA-User |
| Background CPU | 4% |
PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 0
CPU0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
|
70.7%
Very good
|
64% 108 Pts
|
56% 475 Pts
|
100% 1,610 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia Quadro M4000
HP(103C 1153) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 772 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 411.63
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
24.6%
Poor
|
22% 29.5 fps
|
29% 35.7 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
242GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 207 205 202 198 199 MB/s
|
52.2%
Above average
|
46% 203 MB/s
|
92% 31.1 MB/s
|
32% 48.1 MB/s
|
|
LaCie d2 Quadra v3C 4TB
3TB free, PID 107e
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 27 27 27 27 MB/s
|
25.4%
Poor
|
38% 28.7 MB/s
|
209% 2.43 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M393B1K70CH0-CH9 8x8GB
8 of 12 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
45.9%
Average
|
49% 17 GB/s
|
22% 7.6 GB/s
|
53% 75.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Z620 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,393 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP Z620 Workstation
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Xeon E5-1620 0Intel $345Bench 70%, 17,464 samples | 150x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 01stBench 55%, 2,873 samples | 147x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples | 129x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples | 169x |
| Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples | 113x |
| Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples | 95x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 66% - Good | Total price: $345 |