Asrock 970M Pro3

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 45% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	5.59% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	71.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock 970M Pro3 (all builds)
Memory	5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160617
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 06 '18 at 18:30
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	22%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X6 1065T 1,141 User benchmarks, average bench 55% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	48.8% Average	Memory 66.7 1-Core 48.7 2-Core 56.6 40% 57.3 Pts	4-Core 168 8-Core 244 26% 206 Pts	64-Core 250 16% 250 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 48.8% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Gigabyte(1458 36B8) 1GB CLim: 1006 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 416.16 Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	5.59% Terrible	Lighting 6.8 Reflection 7.65 Parallax 9.75 6% 8.07 fps	MRender 4.67 Gravity 8.03 Splatting 7.65 6% 6.78 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.59% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 137GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 313 282 287 286 285 277 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	71.4% Very good	Read 437 Write 374 Mixed 383 SusWrite 289 83% 371 MB/s	4K Read 23.8 4K Write 42.1 4K Mixed 28.7 95% 31.5 MB/s	DQ Read 185 DQ Write 115 DQ Mixed 130 102% 143 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 71.4% Great: 128%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 872GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 190 192 195 199 195 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	110% Outstanding	Read 190 Write 161 Mixed 83.3 SusWrite 193 114% 157 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 1 174% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905595-011.A00LF 4x2GB 28 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	29.2% Poor	MC Read 13.7 MC Write 6.6 MC Mixed 10.9 30% 10.4 GB/s	SC Read 6.1 SC Write 5.3 SC Mixed 8 18% 6.47 GB/s	Latency 109 37% 109 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 29.2% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 970M Pro3 Builds (Compare 843 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970M Pro3

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	289x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	228x
FX-8320AMD $175Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	70x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	92x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	51x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	47x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	27x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	18x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	14x

RAM
TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 2x8GBUnknownBench 52%, 6,864 samples	35x
NMUD380D81-1600C 1x8GBUnknownBench 28%, 485 samples	26x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	24x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Very good

Total price: $217

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16