Asus P7P55D

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (5th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 95 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics29.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive32.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus P7P55D  (all builds)
Memory1.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100521
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 07 '18 at 04:07
Run Duration253 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 870-$100
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
62.3% Good
Memory 77.6
1-Core 72.9
2-Core 132
57% 94.3 Pts
4-Core 257
8-Core 356
39% 307 Pts
64-Core 349
22% 349 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 380-$200
CLim: 980 MHz, MLim: 1475 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.9.3
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.6% Poor
Lighting 34.2
Reflection 50.3
Parallax 60.1
28% 48.2 fps
MRender 48
Gravity 38.8
Splatting 36.2
33% 41 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend SSD370S 256GB-$115
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: O0918B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 76 121 122 90 87 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
32.2% Below average
Read 147
Write 120
Mixed 143
SusWrite 101
29% 128 MB/s
4K Read 10.5
4K Write 22.3
4K Mixed 20.6
54% 17.8 MB/s
DQ Read 31.4
DQ Write 84.7
DQ Mixed 29.5
31% 48.5 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 114%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40
200GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3EA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 28 13 15 18 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
7.89% Terrible
Read 10
Write 15
Mixed 9
SusWrite 17.5
9% 12.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.1
19% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 7.89%
Great: 74%
Samsung Portable SSD T1 1TB
138GB free, PID 8003
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.9 7.9 7.1 6.8 6.8 6.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
16.6% Very poor
Read 26.7
Write 22.3
Mixed 21.3
SusWrite 7.2
25% 19.4 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 4.8
292% 4.17 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 16.6%
Great: 323%
Seagate FA GoFlex Desk 2TB
203GB free, PID 50a1
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.9 7.6 7 6.9 6.8 6.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
6.42% Terrible
Read 24.3
Write 20
Mixed 13.5
SusWrite 7.1
20% 16.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
29% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 6.42%
Great: 49%
SanDisk Extreme Pro USB 3.1 256GB-$43
77GB free, PID 5588
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.6 7.1 7.1 6.8 6.8 6.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
19.9% Very poor
Read 20.5
Write 18.3
Mixed 20.3
SusWrite 7
22% 16.5 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 2.8
271% 4.23 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 122%
LG U+ TAP3 1TB
79GB free, PID 5678
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 20 23 23 22 22 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
11.2% Very poor
Read 20
Write 18.3
Mixed 16.3
SusWrite 22.1
26% 19.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
56% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 21%
WD My Book Duo 0A10 8TB
122GB free, PID 0a10
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.9 7.6 7.5 7.3 7.4 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
7.28% Terrible
Read 24.2
Write 17
Mixed 20.8
SusWrite 9.6
23% 17.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.3
29% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 7.28%
Great: 98%
Seagate FA GoFlex Desk 2TB
157GB free, PID 50a1
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.2 1.2 4.8 6.8 6.7 6.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
3.93% Terrible
Read 13
Write 6.3
Mixed 9.5
SusWrite 4.6
10% 8.35 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.2
19% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 3.93%
Great: 49%
WD My Book 1TB
92GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.7 7.6 7.5 7.4 7.4 8.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
10.3% Very poor
Read 23
Write 18.8
Mixed 16.5
SusWrite 7.6
21% 16.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
76% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
22.1% Poor
MC Read 7.9
MC Write 7.2
MC Mixed 6.5
21% 7.2 GB/s
SC Read 4.3
SC Write 5.6
SC Mixed 5.1
14% 5 GB/s
Latency 85.2
47% 85.2 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 22.1%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P7P55D Builds (Compare 1,210 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P7P55D

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $159
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback