PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 53.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 26.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Gigabyte X399 DESIGNARE EX |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-X399 DESIGNARE EX-CF (all builds) |
Memory | 27.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20170906 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Oct 07 '18 at 16:56 |
Run Duration | 121 Seconds |
Run User | NLD-User |
Background CPU | 73% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
70.5%
Very good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 416.16
|
53.9%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 840 Evo mSATA 120GB-$91
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT43B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 107 89 109 93 95 MB/s
|
26.7%
Poor
|
|||
Philips USB Flash Drive 8GB
1GB free, PID 4200
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.2 6.1 6.1 5.7 5.9 6 MB/s
|
4.34%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial BLS8G4D26BFSBK.8FBD 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
|
69.8%
Good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Ryzen TR 1920XAMD $800Bench 78%, 10,440 samples | 56x |
Ryzen TR 1950XAMD $225Bench 77%, 23,641 samples | 53x |
Ryzen TR 2950XAMD $798Bench 81%, 10,169 samples | 47x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples | 18x |
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,306Bench 210%, 158,856 samples | 18x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 12x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 85% - Excellent | Total price: $1,460 |