HP Mini 110-1000

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 14.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (71%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP Mini 110-1000  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 308F
Memory1 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 576 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100112
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 10 '18 at 19:22
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 71%

 PC Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom N270
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
14.6% Very poor
Memory 27.6
1-Core 6.4
2-Core 10.7
12% 14.9 Pts
4-Core 10.7
8-Core 10.5
1% 10.6 Pts
64-Core 10.6
1% 10.6 Pts
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 33%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Fujitsu MJA2160BH G2 160GB
129GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 8919
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 15 17 21 16 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
6.99% Terrible
Read 6.5
Write 14.7
Mixed 9.7
SusWrite 17.6
9% 12.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.2
43% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 6.99%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 1 slots used
2GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
7.93% Terrible
MC Read 3
MC Write 2.6
MC Mixed 2.1
7% 2.57 GB/s
SC Read 1.8
SC Write 2.4
SC Mixed 2.3
6% 2.17 GB/s
Latency 269
15% 269 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.93%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback