Asus P5QL-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics23.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus P5QL-E  (all builds)
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090911
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateOct 11 '18 at 01:28
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q9550-$161
LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.85 GHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
48.3% Average
Memory 69.5
1-Core 36.1
2-Core 80.9
40% 62.2 Pts
4-Core 159
8-Core 157
21% 158 Pts
64-Core 160
10% 160 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 570-$350
EVGA(3842 1572) 1.2GB
CLim: 797 MHz, MLim: 975 MHz, Ram: 1.2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
23.1% Poor
Lighting 27.5
Reflection 41.4
Parallax 30.7
22% 33.2 fps
MRender 40.1
Gravity 22.4
Splatting 28.3
24% 30.2 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 23.1%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSDPR-CX300-240 240GB
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM91.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 227 236 240 240 240 MB/s
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
66.5% Good
Read 252
Write 179
Mixed 212
SusWrite 234
49% 219 MB/s
4K Read 30.6
4K Write 53.8
4K Mixed 31
115% 38.5 MB/s
DQ Read 138
DQ Write 176
DQ Mixed 125
103% 146 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 92%
Samsung HD250HJ 250GB
189GB free
Firmware: FH100-05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 95 96 96 96 96 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
55.5% Above average
Read 97.8
Write 95.3
Mixed 56.3
SusWrite 95.5
63% 86.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
155% 1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 56%
SAMSUNG HD103SI 1TB
428GB free, PID 0475
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 29 29 29 29 29 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Read 33
Write 30.3
Mixed 29.3
SusWrite 28.9
41% 30.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
84% 1 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
21.3% Poor
MC Read 7.1
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 6.6
19% 6.8 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 6.9
18% 6.37 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 21.3%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5QL-E Builds (Compare 143 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5QL-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 34% - Below average Total price: $308
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback