Asus PRIME B350M-E

Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	16.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	91.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME B350M-E (all builds)
Memory	5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180820
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 12 '18 at 19:41
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 1200-$100 83,528 User benchmarks, average bench 57% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	76% Very good	Memory 78.4 1-Core 108 2-Core 216 75% 134 Pts	4-Core 425 8-Core 427 57% 426 Pts	64-Core 423 26% 423 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 76% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030 185,384 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Gigabyte(1458 375C) 2GB CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 1602 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	16.4% Very poor	Lighting 20.4 Reflection 16.2 Parallax 19.3 17% 18.7 fps	MRender 17.7 Gravity 19.5 Splatting 21 16% 19.4 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 16.4% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX300 240GB-$43 7,269 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 151GB free (System drive) Firmware: M2CR010 SusWrite @10s intervals: 435 430 427 429 429 430 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	91.8% Outstanding	Read 505 Write 473 Mixed 437 SusWrite 430 104% 461 MB/s	4K Read 27.7 4K Write 79.1 4K Mixed 34.2 128% 47 MB/s	DQ Read 179 DQ Write 95.4 DQ Mixed 123 95% 132 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 91.8% Great: 114%
TOSHIBA MK2565GSX 250GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 45GB free, PID 2509 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 38 39 38 39 39 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	18.7% Very poor	Read 36.2 Write 36 Mixed 27.4 SusWrite 38.6 47% 34.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.6 77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 18.7% Great: 19%
Hammer Morespace 1TB 54 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 0GB free, PID 3070 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 35.2 Write 36.2 Mixed 29.1 43% 33.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.5 49% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 21%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G4D26BFSEK.8FBD 1x8GB 1,003 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 3600 MHz clocked @ 1800 MHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	61.4% Good	MC Read 23.4 MC Write 22.5 MC Mixed 19 62% 21.6 GB/s	SC Read 19.9 SC Write 18.2 SC Mixed 18.8 54% 19 GB/s	Latency 83.6 48% 83.6 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 61.4% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME B350M-E Builds (Compare 270 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 29%

Raft

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 27%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME B350M-E

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	37x
Ryzen 5 2400GAMD $135Bench 63%, 127,344 samples	36x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	21x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	31x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	21x
RX Vega 11 (Ryzen iGPU)AMDBench 15%, 44,235 samples	18x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	11x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	10x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	10x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	11x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	7x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 76%, 105,447 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 103% - Outstanding

Total price: $252

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16