Gigabyte GA-P55M-UD2

Performance Results


Gaming 23% Surfboard	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	25.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	59.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-P55M-UD2 (all builds)
Memory	11.7 GB free of 14 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100623
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 14 '18 at 08:08
Run Duration	150 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	17%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 K 875-$180 2,354 User benchmarks, average bench 70% Socket 1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	78.5% Very good	Memory 94.5 1-Core 97.2 2-Core 170 73% 121 Pts	4-Core 355 8-Core 406 50% 380 Pts	64-Core 475 29% 475 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 78.5% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-Ti-$362 42,960 User benchmarks, average bench 26% EVGA(3842 3660) 2GB CLim: 1307 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing below potential (44^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	25.1% Poor	Lighting 28.2 Reflection 33.8 Parallax 41.7 23% 34.6 fps	MRender 45.9 Gravity 35.1 Splatting 29.2 29% 36.7 fps
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 25.1% Great: 29%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150 68,337 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 266GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 202 229 220 218 219 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	59.7% Above average	Read 227 Write 218 Mixed 202 SusWrite 213 48% 215 MB/s	4K Read 27.3 4K Write 50.6 4K Mixed 33.9 112% 37.3 MB/s	DQ Read 38.8 DQ Write 84.1 DQ Mixed 49.5 41% 57.5 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 59.7% Great: 126%
1,556 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 15GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.1 6 8.4 8.4 8.3 8.2 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	5.33% Terrible	Read 18 Write 8 Mixed 5.2 SusWrite 7.5 11% 9.68 MB/s	4K Read 4.6 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 17% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.33% Great: 15%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 32GB 775 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 30GB free, PID 005b Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.5 2.4 1.8 0.9 1.9 MB/s Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 22.2 Write 0.7 Mixed 4.7 SusWrite 1.7 6% 7.33 MB/s	4K Read 5 4K Mixed 0 28% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 14GB 9,406 User benchmarks, average bench 35% null MHz 8192, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	40.9% Average	MC Read 15.4 MC Write 13.3 MC Mixed 11.9 39% 13.5 GB/s	SC Read 11.3 SC Write 10.3 SC Mixed 12 32% 11.2 GB/s	Latency 58.6 68% 58.6 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 40.9% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-P55M-UD2 Builds (Compare 313 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 20%

Surfboard

Desktop 70%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P55M-UD2

CPU
Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples	137x
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	72x
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	33x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	21x
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples	15x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	15x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	12x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	9x
MX500 500GBCrucial $46Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	9x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	69x
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	63x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	39x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $231

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16