PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 27.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 28% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA (all builds) |
Memory | 12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20161107 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Oct 15 '18 at 11:53 |
Run Duration | 233 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 10% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
54.3%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 411.70
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
27.3%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$28
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z33130RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 19 38 29 60 33 MB/s
|
28%
Poor
|
|||
WD Black 2.5" 160GB (2010)-$50
149GB free
Firmware: 12.01A12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 68 74 80 75 74 MB/s
|
44.3%
Average
|
|||
Toshiba MK5065GSXN 500GB
133GB free
Firmware: GH101M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 61 66 72 67 66 MB/s
|
40%
Below average
|
|||
PHD 3.0 Silicon-Power 1TB
520GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 57 63 65 62 62 MB/s
|
24.7%
Poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 16G-D3-1600-MR 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
|
34.9%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 431x |
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 112x |
FX-8370AMD $175Bench 62%, 34,720 samples | 85x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 86x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 66x |
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 51x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $588 |