Asus H87M-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive57.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus H87M-E  (all builds)
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140516
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateOct 16 '18 at 08:48
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570-$62
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Memory 83.9
1-Core 99.4
2-Core 199
73% 127 Pts
4-Core 344
8-Core 335
46% 340 Pts
64-Core 351
22% 351 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
101% Outstanding
Lighting 131
Reflection 136
Parallax 117
107% 128 fps
MRender 106
Gravity 126
Splatting 100
90% 111 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 101%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$150
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 75 68 68 69 70 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
57.1% Above average
Read 259
Write 107
Mixed 143
SusWrite 71
32% 145 MB/s
4K Read 15.5
4K Write 83.7
4K Mixed 31.6
108% 43.6 MB/s
DQ Read 299
DQ Write 88.7
DQ Mixed 103
100% 163 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 110%
Crucial M500 240GB-$54
139GB free
Firmware: MU05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 231 239 251 268 264 266 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Read 392
Write 262
Mixed 287
SusWrite 253
67% 298 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 34
137% 55.5 MB/s
DQ Read 316
DQ Write 259
DQ Mixed 186
167% 254 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 91%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
59GB free
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 290 313 337 396 393 403 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 448
Write 424
Mixed 371
SusWrite 355
90% 399 MB/s
4K Read 42.3
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 61.3
202% 72.2 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 360
270% 360 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 119%
Great: 134%
Toshiba X300 5TB-$125
4.5TB free
Firmware: FP2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 188 196 196 192 193 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 168
Write 156
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 194
105% 144 MB/s
4K Read 5.4
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
390% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 104%
Great: 109%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 64GB-$9
53GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 44 49 26 24 26 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
29.7% Poor
Read 112
Write 38.3
Mixed 38.5
SusWrite 36.3
64% 56.2 MB/s
4K Read 5.2
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
98% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-039.A00LF 99U5471-054.A00LF 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.3% Below average
MC Read 10.5
MC Write 11.2
MC Mixed 8.9
29% 10.2 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 9.3
SC Mixed 8.4
25% 8.9 GB/s
Latency 73.6
54% 73.6 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H87M-E Builds (Compare 852 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H87M-E - $129

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $247
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback