Performance Results


Gaming 31% Sail boat	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	32% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	339% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus MAXIMUS VIII HERO (all builds)
Memory	3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840x2160x4294967296 szín
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170629
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 16 '18 at 17:27
Run Duration	204 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	32%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6600K-$81 342,244 User benchmarks, average bench 72% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	77.8% Very good	Memory 86.2 1-Core 118 2-Core 207 79% 137 Pts	4-Core 396 8-Core 429 54% 413 Pts	64-Core 438 27% 438 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 77.8% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198 440,282 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Asus(1043 8521) 2GB CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 398.36 Performing below potential (46^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	32% Below average	Lighting 41.5 Reflection 40.5 Parallax 36.1 34% 39.4 fps	MRender 37 Gravity 35.9 Splatting 32.4 28% 35.1 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 32% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170 93,447 User benchmarks, average bench 322% 305GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1495 1944 2006 2129 2121 2127 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	339% Outstanding	Read 2,374 Write 2,084 Mixed 1,321 SusWrite 1,971 435% 1,938 MB/s	4K Read 51.5 4K Write 148 4K Mixed 70.4 247% 90.1 MB/s	DQ Read 1,098 DQ Write 1,054 DQ Mixed 1,072 806% 1,075 MB/s
Poor: 195% ↑ This bench: 339% Great: 393%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 97GB free Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 367 370 370 366 371 371 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	95.3% Outstanding	Read 352 Write 368 Mixed 329 SusWrite 369 80% 354 MB/s	4K Read 35.2 4K Write 75.7 4K Mixed 45.7 152% 52.2 MB/s	DQ Read 278 DQ Write 227 DQ Mixed 246 186% 250 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 95.3% Great: 134%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$80 75,644 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 188GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 77 80 79 79 78 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	46.5% Average	Read 83.5 Write 75.5 Mixed 64.2 SusWrite 78.2 56% 75.3 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.9 179% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 46.5% Great: 96%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3000 C15 2x4GB 4,860 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	64% Good	MC Read 23.6 MC Write 24.6 MC Mixed 20.5 65% 22.9 GB/s	SC Read 14.1 SC Write 19.2 SC Mixed 18.2 49% 17.2 GB/s	Latency 71.1 56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 64% Great: 108%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 86%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 72%

Battleship

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	345x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	254x
Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GBG.SKILL $31Bench 71%, 98,777 samples	137x

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $958

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16